From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JPlZr-0001i8-QM for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 21:25:07 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2749AE072C; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 21:25:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02C7AE072C for ; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 21:25:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.20.111] (unknown [69.80.192.62]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 750446497D; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 21:25:00 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-council] CoC: informal enforcement From: Ned Ludd To: Roy Bamford Cc: Donnie Berkholz , gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <1203021957l.5905l.2l@spike> References: <1203021957l.5905l.2l@spike> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Gentoo Linux Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 13:24:58 -0800 Message-Id: <1203024298.4132.6.camel@hangover> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: e0600828-114a-4b55-b991-5f831184e916 X-Archives-Hash: 46f36362fffa3bc1ef57d515a31b1ca8 On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 20:45 +0000, Roy Bamford wrote: [snip] > Ned, > > I think very few ex-proctors would be jumping in for a second helping > after the way they were supported by the council that created them. That's probably very true and I can't blame them. -- Ned Ludd Gentoo Linux -- gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org mailing list