From: Ferris McCormick <fmccor@gentoo.org>
To: Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@gentoo.org>
Cc: gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-council] CoC: informal enforcement
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 12:36:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1202992583.6251.4.camel@liasis.inforead.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080214101334.GA9749@supernova>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1401 bytes --]
On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 02:13 -0800, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm proposing to start CoC enforcement in a simple manner that doesn't
> require approval of any sort, and I'd like to discuss it at the council
> meeting to get your feedback.
>
> What I want to do is build a core culture of people who refuse to
> tolerate assholes. We can do this by getting together a small group who
> will reply to any gentoo-dev posts or #gentoo-dev comments by people who
> are being jerks, telling them that they're being a jerk and not replying
> to the substance of the jerk's post at all. Replies to the substance of
> a post would come separately or not at all. Having a group of people
> reply to hostile posters should begin rebuilding a culture that doesn't
> tolerate that type of action.
>
> People who are consistently jerks are incompetent developers and should
> be treated as such.
>
> Thanks,
> Donnie
Nice idea and worth a try. I have one concern. Since we are talking
CoC here, I'd like to emphasise that "assholeness" should be determined
within the guidelines of the CoC. Not by some person's own conception
of "assholeness" --- I'd hate to see a flame war about just who is being
the asshole in any particular instance.
Regards,
--
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <fmccor@gentoo.org>
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Devrel, Sparc, Userrel)
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-14 12:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-14 10:13 [gentoo-council] CoC: informal enforcement Donnie Berkholz
2008-02-14 11:51 ` Luca Barbato
2008-02-14 12:36 ` Ferris McCormick [this message]
2008-02-14 17:31 ` Donnie Berkholz
2008-02-14 19:31 ` Wernfried Haas
2008-02-14 19:39 ` Ned Ludd
2008-02-14 19:44 ` Donnie Berkholz
2008-02-14 20:03 ` Ned Ludd
2008-02-14 20:08 ` Donnie Berkholz
2008-02-14 20:45 ` Roy Bamford
2008-02-14 21:24 ` Ned Ludd
2008-02-14 21:34 ` Donnie Berkholz
2008-02-14 21:22 ` Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
2008-02-14 20:21 ` Roy Bamford
2008-02-14 21:25 ` Donnie Berkholz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1202992583.6251.4.camel@liasis.inforead.com \
--to=fmccor@gentoo.org \
--cc=dberkholz@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox