From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K3bpV-0004Yq-2T for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 03 Jun 2008 19:05:57 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0D2F6E045A; Tue, 3 Jun 2008 19:05:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from QMTA04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.62.40]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B45E7E045A for ; Tue, 3 Jun 2008 19:05:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from OMTA09.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.20]) by QMTA04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id ZVER1Z0020SCNGk5409u00; Tue, 03 Jun 2008 19:05:55 +0000 Received: from mail.twi-31o2.org ([24.6.98.17]) by OMTA09.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id ZX5s1Z00G0NWACg3V00000; Tue, 03 Jun 2008 19:05:53 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=fghu54fEROIA:10 a=wFAgNWf3vV8A:10 a=m_v1XLcj82Xb2BBAiBQA:9 a=FbDRkjnldR_fZPG2TgQcZ5yKogMA:4 a=MxZ3bB5I4kYA:10 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.twi-31o2.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 140668B4002 for ; Tue, 3 Jun 2008 19:05:52 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at twi-31o2.org Received: from mail.twi-31o2.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (gravity.twi-31o2.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AhjkNGLztlxL for ; Tue, 3 Jun 2008 19:05:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from draco2 (orion.twi-31o2.org [192.168.0.11]) by mail.twi-31o2.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B06DA17B8057 for ; Tue, 3 Jun 2008 19:05:37 +0000 (UTC) From: "Chrissy Fullam" To: References: <4845954C.6070809@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4845954C.6070809@gentoo.org> Subject: RE: [gentoo-council] Election voting period and type Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 12:05:26 -0700 Message-ID: <0c9301c8c5ac$ce4c8ff0$6ae5afd0$@org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AcjFrGiZktNdLDQuSyG1xulUXlwWOAAAD+RA Content-Language: en-us X-Archives-Salt: 9d82a667-f2fa-44a3-8bb7-405c01107cff X-Archives-Hash: b4c111dc44998392aef137753301337b > Ok so we have the council majority saying we should have some kind of > elections. I don't think a 1-week vote (option 2) makes a lot of sense any > more as normal elections are closing any way. What we should decide is if > we go with the traditional 4 weeks nominating and 4 weeks voting or a > shorter 2+2. I think we should go with the 2+2 to get back into working > order faster and the time should be long enough for anyone actively > working on Gentoo to notice. We already have people who have offered their > services as election offices so if enough council members put +1 here we > can get the ball rolling immediately. 2+2 weeks = +1 -- gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org mailing list