From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Igkjh-0003m5-7x for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 13 Oct 2007 17:25:13 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with SMTP id l9DHF51M011836; Sat, 13 Oct 2007 17:15:05 GMT Received: from mail.twi-31o2.org (c-24-6-168-204.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.6.168.204]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l9DHF4js011823; Sat, 13 Oct 2007 17:15:04 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.twi-31o2.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6BF417B805F; Sat, 13 Oct 2007 17:15:03 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at twi-31o2.org Received: from mail.twi-31o2.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (gravity.twi-31o2.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HDTbOjEj4U32; Sat, 13 Oct 2007 17:14:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from draco2 (orion.twi-31o2.org [192.168.0.11]) by mail.twi-31o2.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76DF517B805E; Sat, 13 Oct 2007 17:14:57 +0000 (UTC) From: "Chrissy Fullam" To: Cc: References: <20071011230306.GD23990@supernova> Subject: [gentoo-council] RE: [gentoo-dev] Council meeting summary for 11 October 2007 Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 10:14:48 -0700 Message-ID: <09EA41D0A8D249D8A3D6708C15ABD237@draco2> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-council@gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.4073 In-reply-to: <20071011230306.GD23990@supernova> Thread-Index: AcgMW1Pyp7OF4HkkTIa1QWRFG88j3ABYIaNA X-Archives-Salt: 587a9be6-214e-49bf-b1b1-d7407db19826 X-Archives-Hash: 8af5b843185931f22d8cdb8029c14a94 > Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > Here is the summary from today's council meeting. The > complete log will show up at - The CoC is in effect, but it needs a new enforcement section since the proctors were disbanded. The council is sending discussion of this to the gentoo-project list, to come up with proposals for three points: - who enforces it - musikc said devrel could - tsunam said userrel could I wanted to clarify, please understand the intent behind my part of the conversation was that devrel and userrel should continue to share the responsibility as appropriate, and continue to work together, including the questionable/overlapping areas. The above may have been misinterpreted by some to indicate 'pick which one', when my intent was a joined front on enforcing the CoC. Kind regards, Christina Fullam Gentoo Developer Relations Lead | Gentoo Public Relations -- gentoo-council@gentoo.org mailing list