From: "Chrissy Fullam" <musikc@gentoo.org>
To: "'gentoo-nfp'" <gentoo-nfp@lists.gentoo.org>
Cc: "'gentoo-council'" <gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org>
Subject: RE: [gentoo-council] Foundation by laws: new Article V
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 14:42:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <02ee01c90bb2$822c5f00$86851d00$@org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <02a001c90ba7$8cc981f0$a65c85d0$@org>
I wanted to add two things to my previous email
> Refer to bylaws that were approved in today's Trustee meeting:
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~neddyseagoon/docs/FoundationBylawsProposed_7.xml
> I cannot understand why a person cannot be on the Council and on the
> Trustees? We had someone do so in the past and no conflicts or issues
> arose. What is the reasoning that a person cannot serve on the
> technical team and the legal team?
>
> Please note: that I do not see validity in the statement 'what if
> Council asks for money and dual role person on the Trustee approves
> it' as I think that person would hold the same opinion regardless of
> being on both teams unless we are saying that we cannot trust our
> Council people to not make decisions in the best interest of Gentoo.
========================================
<addition>
From the Gentoo Foundation Charter page:
"... the Gentoo project needs a framework for intellectual property
protection and financial contributions while limiting the contributors'
legal exposure. The Gentoo Foundation will embody this framework without
intervening in the Gentoo development."
If the Trustees are not supposed to intervene in Gentoo development, that
being the technical direction of Gentoo, aren't they are in direct violation
of this by determining who cannot be a Council member by their own
membership?
========================================
<second addition>
Fmccor voted today that there should be a separation of Trustees and
Council. I see a direct conflict in how he was a Trustee and ran for
Council, but after not being elected he has now decided that no one else can
do it either? He accepted his own Council nomination on 2008-06-05 and
responded to a series of 'questions to our nominees' on the same date.
From his own email response:
> > 4. How do you think the council and trustees can work together to
> > make Gentoo better?
> I'm already a trustee, so having a council member who is a trustee is
> a start.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-31 21:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-31 20:24 [gentoo-council] Foundation by laws: new Article V Chrissy Fullam
2008-08-31 21:42 ` Chrissy Fullam [this message]
2008-08-31 23:51 ` Alec Warner
[not found] ` <20080831230836.B0A43207511@starwind.baent.net>
[not found] ` <20080901040858.36A9C14B7@starwind.baent.net>
[not found] ` <1220244662.18195.4.camel@wlt.obsidian-studios.com>
2008-09-02 4:44 ` [gentoo-nfp] " Chrissy Fullam
2008-09-02 13:55 ` Roy Bamford
2008-09-02 19:09 ` Chrissy Fullam
[not found] ` <1220360574.11021.10.camel@wlt.obsidian-studios.com>
2008-09-02 15:06 ` Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
2008-09-02 15:48 ` Roy Bamford
[not found] ` <48BDBB35.9060704@gentoo.org>
2008-09-02 23:01 ` Ferris McCormick
2008-09-03 16:50 ` Roy Bamford
2008-08-31 22:46 ` [gentoo-council] Re: [gentoo-nfp] " Alec Warner
[not found] ` <1220223052.12958.17.camel@wlt.obsidian-studios.com>
2008-08-31 23:07 ` [gentoo-council] " Chrissy Fullam
2008-08-31 23:44 ` Alec Warner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='02ee01c90bb2$822c5f00$86851d00$@org' \
--to=musikc@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-nfp@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox