From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-commits+bounces-578476-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45FFB1381F3
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Fri,  5 Apr 2013 18:14:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CA672E091A;
	Fri,  5 Apr 2013 18:14:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67469E091A
	for <gentoo-commits@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri,  5 Apr 2013 18:14:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from flycatcher.gentoo.org (flycatcher.gentoo.org [81.93.255.6])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F65233DDA8
	for <gentoo-commits@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri,  5 Apr 2013 18:14:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by flycatcher.gentoo.org (Postfix, from userid 617)
	id 4BBA12171D; Fri,  5 Apr 2013 18:14:12 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Sven Vermeulen (swift)" <swift@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-commits@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org, swift@gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-commits] gentoo commit in xml/htdocs/proj/en/hardened/selinux: hb-using-changes.xml
X-VCS-Repository: gentoo
X-VCS-Files: hb-using-changes.xml
X-VCS-Directories: xml/htdocs/proj/en/hardened/selinux
X-VCS-Committer: swift
X-VCS-Committer-Name: Sven Vermeulen
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <20130405181412.4BBA12171D@flycatcher.gentoo.org>
Date: Fri,  5 Apr 2013 18:14:12 +0000 (UTC)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-commits@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-commits+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-commits+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-commits+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-commits.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-commits@lists.gentoo.org
X-Archives-Salt: a03567be-cc02-4614-b839-b73ddfd856c7
X-Archives-Hash: 308a99a9cacd2eb25fd2000778fc8d96

swift       13/04/05 18:14:12

  Modified:             hb-using-changes.xml
  Log:
  Make USE=unconfined usage a bit more clear in change history

Revision  Changes    Path
1.9                  xml/htdocs/proj/en/hardened/selinux/hb-using-changes.xml

file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewvc.cgi/gentoo/xml/htdocs/proj/en/hardened/selinux/hb-using-changes.xml?rev=1.9&view=markup
plain: http://sources.gentoo.org/viewvc.cgi/gentoo/xml/htdocs/proj/en/hardened/selinux/hb-using-changes.xml?rev=1.9&content-type=text/plain
diff : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewvc.cgi/gentoo/xml/htdocs/proj/en/hardened/selinux/hb-using-changes.xml?r1=1.8&r2=1.9

Index: hb-using-changes.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo/xml/htdocs/proj/en/hardened/selinux/hb-using-changes.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.8
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -r1.8 -r1.9
--- hb-using-changes.xml	10 Mar 2013 16:01:33 -0000	1.8
+++ hb-using-changes.xml	5 Apr 2013 18:14:12 -0000	1.9
@@ -4,11 +4,11 @@
 <!-- The content of this document is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license -->
 <!-- See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0 -->
 
-<!-- $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo/xml/htdocs/proj/en/hardened/selinux/hb-using-changes.xml,v 1.8 2013/03/10 16:01:33 swift Exp $ -->
+<!-- $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo/xml/htdocs/proj/en/hardened/selinux/hb-using-changes.xml,v 1.9 2013/04/05 18:14:12 swift Exp $ -->
 
 <sections>
-<version>8</version>
-<date>2013-03-10</date>
+<version>9</version>
+<date>2013-04-05</date>
 
 
 <section>
@@ -42,7 +42,9 @@
 From <path>selinux-base-2.20120725-r9</path> onwards, we will now also support
 a <c>USE=unconfined</c> setting. When enabled, it will configure your SELinux
 policy to support the unconfined domains. If your policy is <e>targeted</e>,
-this behavior will be implied.
+this behavior will be implied, whereas the <e>strict</e> policy will not
+consider this USE flag at all (it will not activate unconfined domains on
+strict).
 </p>
 
 <p>