From: "Ryan Hill (dirtyepic)" <dirtyepic@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-commits@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in media-fonts/urw-fonts: urw-fonts-2.4.6.ebuild urw-fonts-2.4.9.ebuild ChangeLog
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 01:17:16 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101001011716.C2A2520051@flycatcher.gentoo.org> (raw)
dirtyepic 10/10/01 01:17:16
Modified: urw-fonts-2.4.6.ebuild urw-fonts-2.4.9.ebuild
ChangeLog
Log:
Grammar fix.
(Portage version: 2.2_rc88/cvs/Linux x86_64)
Revision Changes Path
1.13 media-fonts/urw-fonts/urw-fonts-2.4.6.ebuild
file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/media-fonts/urw-fonts/urw-fonts-2.4.6.ebuild?rev=1.13&view=markup
plain: http://sources.gentoo.org/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/media-fonts/urw-fonts/urw-fonts-2.4.6.ebuild?rev=1.13&content-type=text/plain
diff : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/media-fonts/urw-fonts/urw-fonts-2.4.6.ebuild?r1=1.12&r2=1.13
Index: urw-fonts-2.4.6.ebuild
===================================================================
RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/media-fonts/urw-fonts/urw-fonts-2.4.6.ebuild,v
retrieving revision 1.12
retrieving revision 1.13
diff -u -r1.12 -r1.13
--- urw-fonts-2.4.6.ebuild 8 Mar 2010 21:08:20 -0000 1.12
+++ urw-fonts-2.4.6.ebuild 1 Oct 2010 01:17:16 -0000 1.13
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# Copyright 1999-2010 Gentoo Foundation
# Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
-# $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/media-fonts/urw-fonts/urw-fonts-2.4.6.ebuild,v 1.12 2010/03/08 21:08:20 grobian Exp $
+# $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/media-fonts/urw-fonts/urw-fonts-2.4.6.ebuild,v 1.13 2010/10/01 01:17:16 dirtyepic Exp $
# At some point URW++ released fonts under GPL license. After that they were took
# and improved by Valek Filippov and this work was somehow related with AFPL...
@@ -44,5 +44,5 @@
pkg_postinst() {
font_pkg_postinst
elog "If you upgraded from ${PN}-2.1-r2 some fonts will look a bit"
- elog "differently. Take a look at bug #208990 if interested."
+ elog "different. Take a look at bug #208990 if interested."
}
1.9 media-fonts/urw-fonts/urw-fonts-2.4.9.ebuild
file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/media-fonts/urw-fonts/urw-fonts-2.4.9.ebuild?rev=1.9&view=markup
plain: http://sources.gentoo.org/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/media-fonts/urw-fonts/urw-fonts-2.4.9.ebuild?rev=1.9&content-type=text/plain
diff : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/media-fonts/urw-fonts/urw-fonts-2.4.9.ebuild?r1=1.8&r2=1.9
Index: urw-fonts-2.4.9.ebuild
===================================================================
RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/media-fonts/urw-fonts/urw-fonts-2.4.9.ebuild,v
retrieving revision 1.8
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -r1.8 -r1.9
--- urw-fonts-2.4.9.ebuild 24 Sep 2010 14:44:39 -0000 1.8
+++ urw-fonts-2.4.9.ebuild 1 Oct 2010 01:17:16 -0000 1.9
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# Copyright 1999-2010 Gentoo Foundation
# Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
-# $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/media-fonts/urw-fonts/urw-fonts-2.4.9.ebuild,v 1.8 2010/09/24 14:44:39 leio Exp $
+# $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/media-fonts/urw-fonts/urw-fonts-2.4.9.ebuild,v 1.9 2010/10/01 01:17:16 dirtyepic Exp $
# At some point URW++ released fonts under GPL license. After that they were took
# and improved by Valek Filippov and this work was somehow related with AFPL...
@@ -48,5 +48,5 @@
pkg_postinst() {
font_pkg_postinst
elog "If you upgraded from ${PN}-2.1-r2 some fonts will look a bit"
- elog "differently. Take a look at bug #208990 if interested."
+ elog "different. Take a look at bug #208990 if interested."
}
1.51 media-fonts/urw-fonts/ChangeLog
file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/media-fonts/urw-fonts/ChangeLog?rev=1.51&view=markup
plain: http://sources.gentoo.org/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/media-fonts/urw-fonts/ChangeLog?rev=1.51&content-type=text/plain
diff : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/media-fonts/urw-fonts/ChangeLog?r1=1.50&r2=1.51
Index: ChangeLog
===================================================================
RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/media-fonts/urw-fonts/ChangeLog,v
retrieving revision 1.50
retrieving revision 1.51
diff -u -r1.50 -r1.51
--- ChangeLog 24 Sep 2010 14:44:39 -0000 1.50
+++ ChangeLog 1 Oct 2010 01:17:16 -0000 1.51
@@ -1,6 +1,10 @@
# ChangeLog for media-fonts/urw-fonts
# Copyright 1999-2010 Gentoo Foundation; Distributed under the GPL v2
-# $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/media-fonts/urw-fonts/ChangeLog,v 1.50 2010/09/24 14:44:39 leio Exp $
+# $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/media-fonts/urw-fonts/ChangeLog,v 1.51 2010/10/01 01:17:16 dirtyepic Exp $
+
+ 01 Oct 2010; Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@gentoo.org> urw-fonts-2.4.6.ebuild,
+ urw-fonts-2.4.9.ebuild:
+ Grammar fix.
24 Sep 2010; Mart Raudsepp <leio@gentoo.org> urw-fonts-2.4.9.ebuild:
Add ~mips keyword, needed by ghostscript-gpl for cups
reply other threads:[~2010-10-01 1:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101001011716.C2A2520051@flycatcher.gentoo.org \
--to=dirtyepic@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-commits@lists.gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox