From: "Sam James" <sam@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-commits@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: sys-devel/gcc/files/, sys-devel/gcc/
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2025 22:43:23 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1743547373.f29cc45282812f48bdabb4c0e59020515ed13e17.sam@gentoo> (raw)
commit: f29cc45282812f48bdabb4c0e59020515ed13e17
Author: Sam James <sam <AT> gentoo <DOT> org>
AuthorDate: Tue Apr 1 22:42:28 2025 +0000
Commit: Sam James <sam <AT> gentoo <DOT> org>
CommitDate: Tue Apr 1 22:42:53 2025 +0000
URL: https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=f29cc452
sys-devel/gcc: disable musttail again; C++ lifetime fix for 15.0.1_pre20250330
Hopefully the remaining musttail bits will land soon.
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/952964
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam <AT> gentoo.org>
...gcc-15.0.1_pre20250330-lifetime-extension.patch | 168 +++++++++++++++++++++
sys-devel/gcc/gcc-15.0.1_pre20250330-r1.ebuild | 55 +++++++
2 files changed, 223 insertions(+)
diff --git a/sys-devel/gcc/files/gcc-15.0.1_pre20250330-lifetime-extension.patch b/sys-devel/gcc/files/gcc-15.0.1_pre20250330-lifetime-extension.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..42eed3f6bb86
--- /dev/null
+++ b/sys-devel/gcc/files/gcc-15.0.1_pre20250330-lifetime-extension.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,168 @@
+https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/Z-sCHDjucrcWTs2f@redhat.com/
+
+From d1ddf83b25fbe6c7c247007c754b7858cfaea916 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+Message-ID: <d1ddf83b25fbe6c7c247007c754b7858cfaea916.1743458566.git.sam@gentoo.org>
+From: Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>
+Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2025 16:59:08 -0400
+Subject: [PATCH] c++: fix missing lifetime extension [PR119383]
+
+Since r15-8011 cp_build_indirect_ref_1 won't do the *&TARGET_EXPR ->
+TARGET_EXPR folding not to change its value category. That fix seems
+correct but it made us stop extending the lifetime in this testcase,
+causing a wrong-code issue -- extend_ref_init_temps_1 did not see
+through the extra *& because it doesn't use a tree walk.
+
+This patch reverts r15-8011 and instead handles the problem in
+build_over_call by calling force_lvalue in the is_really_empty_class
+case as well as in the general case.
+
+ PR c++/119383
+
+gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
+
+ * call.cc (build_over_call): Use force_lvalue to ensure op= returns
+ an lvalue.
+ * cp-tree.h (force_lvalue): Declare.
+ * cvt.cc (force_lvalue): New.
+ * typeck.cc (cp_build_indirect_ref_1): Revert r15-8011.
+
+gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
+
+* g++.dg/cpp0x/temp-extend3.C: New test.
+---
+ gcc/cp/call.cc | 9 ++++---
+ gcc/cp/cp-tree.h | 1 +
+ gcc/cp/cvt.cc | 13 +++++++++
+ gcc/cp/typeck.cc | 10 +++----
+ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/temp-extend3.C | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++
+ 5 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
+ create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/temp-extend3.C
+
+diff --git a/gcc/cp/call.cc b/gcc/cp/call.cc
+index c1c8987ec8b1..b1469cb5a4c9 100644
+--- a/gcc/cp/call.cc
++++ b/gcc/cp/call.cc
+@@ -10828,10 +10828,8 @@ build_over_call (struct z_candidate *cand, int flags, tsubst_flags_t complain)
+ if (is_really_empty_class (type, /*ignore_vptr*/true))
+ {
+ /* Avoid copying empty classes, but ensure op= returns an lvalue even
+- if the object argument isn't one. This isn't needed in other cases
+- since MODIFY_EXPR is always considered an lvalue. */
+- to = cp_build_addr_expr (to, tf_none);
+- to = cp_build_indirect_ref (input_location, to, RO_ARROW, complain);
++ if the object argument isn't one. */
++ to = force_lvalue (to, complain);
+ val = build2 (COMPOUND_EXPR, type, arg, to);
+ suppress_warning (val, OPT_Wunused);
+ }
+@@ -10852,6 +10850,9 @@ build_over_call (struct z_candidate *cand, int flags, tsubst_flags_t complain)
+ tree array_type, alias_set;
+
+ arg2 = TYPE_SIZE_UNIT (as_base);
++ /* Ensure op= returns an lvalue even if the object argument isn't
++ one. */
++ to = force_lvalue (to, complain);
+ to = cp_stabilize_reference (to);
+ arg0 = cp_build_addr_expr (to, complain);
+
+diff --git a/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h b/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
+index 2f2122dcf241..927f51b116b3 100644
+--- a/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
++++ b/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
+@@ -7079,6 +7079,7 @@ extern tree convert_to_reference (tree, tree, int, int, tree,
+ tsubst_flags_t);
+ extern tree convert_from_reference (tree);
+ extern tree force_rvalue (tree, tsubst_flags_t);
++extern tree force_lvalue (tree, tsubst_flags_t);
+ extern tree ocp_convert (tree, tree, int, int,
+ tsubst_flags_t);
+ extern tree cp_convert (tree, tree, tsubst_flags_t);
+diff --git a/gcc/cp/cvt.cc b/gcc/cp/cvt.cc
+index bd1f147f2c56..f663a6d08c89 100644
+--- a/gcc/cp/cvt.cc
++++ b/gcc/cp/cvt.cc
+@@ -575,6 +575,19 @@ force_rvalue (tree expr, tsubst_flags_t complain)
+ return expr;
+ }
+
++/* Force EXPR to be an lvalue, if it isn't already. */
++
++tree
++force_lvalue (tree expr, tsubst_flags_t complain)
++{
++ if (!lvalue_p (expr))
++ {
++ expr = cp_build_addr_expr (expr, complain);
++ expr = cp_build_indirect_ref (input_location, expr, RO_ARROW, complain);
++ }
++ return expr;
++}
++
+ \f
+ /* If EXPR and ORIG are INTEGER_CSTs, return a version of EXPR that has
+ TREE_OVERFLOW set only if it is set in ORIG. Otherwise, return EXPR
+diff --git a/gcc/cp/typeck.cc b/gcc/cp/typeck.cc
+index c8e4441fb8b4..4f4dc683b5a0 100644
+--- a/gcc/cp/typeck.cc
++++ b/gcc/cp/typeck.cc
+@@ -3870,13 +3870,11 @@ cp_build_indirect_ref_1 (location_t loc, tree ptr, ref_operator errorstring,
+ return error_mark_node;
+ }
+ else if (do_fold && TREE_CODE (pointer) == ADDR_EXPR
+- && same_type_p (t, TREE_TYPE (TREE_OPERAND (pointer, 0)))
+- /* Don't let this change the value category. '*&TARGET_EXPR'
+- is an lvalue, but folding it into 'TARGET_EXPR' would turn
+- it into a prvalue of class type. */
+- && lvalue_p (TREE_OPERAND (pointer, 0)))
++ && same_type_p (t, TREE_TYPE (TREE_OPERAND (pointer, 0))))
+ /* The POINTER was something like `&x'. We simplify `*&x' to
+- `x'. */
++ `x'. This change the value category: '*&TARGET_EXPR'
++ is an lvalue and folding it into 'TARGET_EXPR' turns it into
++ a prvalue of class type. */
+ return TREE_OPERAND (pointer, 0);
+ else
+ {
+diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/temp-extend3.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/temp-extend3.C
+new file mode 100644
+index 000000000000..3eab88d0076e
+--- /dev/null
++++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/temp-extend3.C
+@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
++// PR c++/119383
++// { dg-do run { target c++11 } }
++
++int g;
++
++struct base {
++ virtual base *clone() const = 0;
++ ~base() { }
++};
++
++struct impl : virtual base {
++ base *clone() const { return new impl; } // #1
++ impl() { ++g; }
++ ~impl() { --g; }
++};
++
++const base *
++make_a_clone ()
++{
++ const base &base = impl{}; // #2
++ return base.clone();
++}
++
++int
++main ()
++{
++ make_a_clone ();
++ // impl::impl() is called twice (#1 and #2), impl::~impl() once,
++ // at the end of make_a_clone.
++ if (g != 1)
++ __builtin_abort ();
++}
+
+base-commit: aa3aaf2bfb8fcc17076993df4297597b68bc5f60
+--
+2.49.0
+
diff --git a/sys-devel/gcc/gcc-15.0.1_pre20250330-r1.ebuild b/sys-devel/gcc/gcc-15.0.1_pre20250330-r1.ebuild
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..795b82277a85
--- /dev/null
+++ b/sys-devel/gcc/gcc-15.0.1_pre20250330-r1.ebuild
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
+# Copyright 1999-2025 Gentoo Authors
+# Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
+
+EAPI=8
+
+TOOLCHAIN_PATCH_DEV="sam"
+TOOLCHAIN_HAS_TESTS=1
+PATCH_GCC_VER="15.0.0"
+PATCH_VER="50"
+MUSL_VER="2"
+MUSL_GCC_VER="15.0.0"
+PYTHON_COMPAT=( python3_{10..13} )
+
+if [[ -n ${TOOLCHAIN_GCC_RC} ]] ; then
+ # Cheesy hack for RCs
+ MY_PV=$(ver_cut 1).$((($(ver_cut 2) + 1))).$((($(ver_cut 3) - 1)))-RC-$(ver_cut 5)
+ MY_P=${PN}-${MY_PV}
+ GCC_TARBALL_SRC_URI="mirror://gcc/snapshots/${MY_PV}/${MY_P}.tar.xz"
+ TOOLCHAIN_SET_S=no
+ S="${WORKDIR}"/${MY_P}
+fi
+
+inherit toolchain
+
+if tc_is_live ; then
+ # Needs to be after inherit (for now?), bug #830908
+ EGIT_BRANCH=master
+elif [[ -z ${TOOLCHAIN_USE_GIT_PATCHES} ]] ; then
+ # Don't keyword live ebuilds
+ #KEYWORDS="~alpha ~amd64 ~arm ~arm64 ~hppa ~loong ~m68k ~mips ~ppc ~ppc64 ~riscv ~s390 ~sparc ~x86"
+ :;
+fi
+
+if [[ ${CATEGORY} != cross-* ]] ; then
+ # Technically only if USE=hardened *too* right now, but no point in complicating it further.
+ # If GCC is enabling CET by default, we need glibc to be built with support for it.
+ # bug #830454
+ RDEPEND="elibc_glibc? ( sys-libs/glibc[cet(-)?] )"
+ DEPEND="${RDEPEND}"
+fi
+
+src_prepare() {
+ local p upstreamed_patches=(
+ # add them here
+ 80_all_PR119376-tailc-Don-t-fail-musttail-calls-if-they-use-or-could.patch
+ )
+ for p in "${upstreamed_patches[@]}"; do
+ rm -v "${WORKDIR}/patch/${p}" || die
+ done
+
+ toolchain_src_prepare
+ eapply "${FILESDIR}"/${P}-lifetime-extension.patch
+ eapply "${FILESDIR}"/${PN}-15.0.1_pre20250323-disable-musttail.patch
+ eapply_user
+}
next reply other threads:[~2025-04-01 22:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-01 22:43 Sam James [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-06-24 19:16 [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: sys-devel/gcc/files/, sys-devel/gcc/ Sam James
2025-04-25 16:32 Sam James
2025-04-21 6:22 Sam James
2025-04-10 17:50 Sam James
2025-04-07 4:05 Sam James
2025-03-27 14:43 Sam James
2025-03-26 12:39 Sam James
2025-03-03 19:40 Sam James
2025-02-23 5:42 Sam James
2025-02-15 4:01 Sam James
2024-12-27 18:01 Sam James
2024-09-24 1:41 Sam James
2024-09-23 15:23 Sam James
2024-05-08 14:56 Sam James
2024-03-26 20:09 Sam James
2024-03-04 23:34 Sam James
2023-10-24 1:59 Sam James
2023-10-03 19:03 Sam James
2023-03-29 1:51 Sam James
2022-08-22 1:41 Sam James
2019-05-29 19:22 Andreas K. Hüttel
2019-05-01 17:14 Sergei Trofimovich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1743547373.f29cc45282812f48bdabb4c0e59020515ed13e17.sam@gentoo \
--to=sam@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-commits@lists.gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox