From: "Sam James" <sam@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-commits@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-commits] proj/gcc-patches:master commit in: 15.0.0/gentoo/
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 16:22:26 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1736871737.5c4e50d6f18794b3bece70beadb05d256087f45d.sam@gentoo> (raw)
commit: 5c4e50d6f18794b3bece70beadb05d256087f45d
Author: Sam James <sam <AT> gentoo <DOT> org>
AuthorDate: Tue Jan 14 16:22:17 2025 +0000
Commit: Sam James <sam <AT> gentoo <DOT> org>
CommitDate: Tue Jan 14 16:22:17 2025 +0000
URL: https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/gcc-patches.git/commit/?id=5c4e50d6
15.0.0: drop upstream ifcombine patch
Merged upstream.
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam <AT> gentoo.org>
...xtend-constants-to-compare-with-bitfields.patch | 214 ---------------------
15.0.0/gentoo/README.history | 1 +
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 214 deletions(-)
diff --git a/15.0.0/gentoo/84_all_PR118456-check-and-extend-constants-to-compare-with-bitfields.patch b/15.0.0/gentoo/84_all_PR118456-check-and-extend-constants-to-compare-with-bitfields.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index e005c02..0000000
--- a/15.0.0/gentoo/84_all_PR118456-check-and-extend-constants-to-compare-with-bitfields.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,214 +0,0 @@
-https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/ora5bugmmi.fsf@lxoliva.fsfla.org/
-
-From 4e794a3a5de8e8fa0fcaf98e5ea298d4a3c71192 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-Message-ID: <4e794a3a5de8e8fa0fcaf98e5ea298d4a3c71192.1736844127.git.sam@gentoo.org>
-From: Alexandre Oliva <oliva@adacore.com>
-Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 23:22:45 -0300
-Subject: [PATCH 1/2] check and extend constants to compare with bitfields
- [PR118456]
-
-Add logic to check and extend constants compared with bitfields, so
-that fields are only compared with constants they could actually
-equal. This involves making sure the signedness doesn't change
-between loads and conversions before shifts: we'd need to carry a lot
-more data to deal with all the possibilities.
-
-Regstrapped on x86_64-linux-gnu. Ok to install?
-
-for gcc/ChangeLog
-
- PR tree-optimization/118456
- * gimple-fold.cc (decode_field_reference): Punt if shifting
- after changing signedness.
- (fold_truth_andor_for_ifcombine): Check extension bits in
- constants before clipping.
-
-for gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
-
-PR tree-optimization/118456
- * gcc.dg/field-merge-21.c: New.
- * gcc.dg/field-merge-22.c: New.
----
- gcc/gimple-fold.cc | 40 +++++++++++++++++++-
- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/field-merge-21.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/field-merge-22.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++
- 3 files changed, 122 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
- create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/field-merge-21.c
- create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/field-merge-22.c
-
-diff --git a/gcc/gimple-fold.cc b/gcc/gimple-fold.cc
-index 93ed8b3abb05..5b1fbe6db1df 100644
---- a/gcc/gimple-fold.cc
-+++ b/gcc/gimple-fold.cc
-@@ -7712,6 +7712,18 @@ decode_field_reference (tree *pexp, HOST_WIDE_INT *pbitsize,
-
- if (shiftrt)
- {
-+ /* Punt if we're shifting by more than the loaded bitfield (after
-+ adjustment), or if there's a shift after a change of signedness, punt.
-+ When comparing this field with a constant, we'll check that the
-+ constant is a proper sign- or zero-extension (depending on signedness)
-+ of a value that would fit in the selected portion of the bitfield. A
-+ shift after a change of signedness would make the extension
-+ non-uniform, and we can't deal with that (yet ???). See
-+ gcc.dg/field-merge-22.c for a test that would go wrong. */
-+ if (*pbitsize <= shiftrt
-+ || (convert_before_shift
-+ && outer_type && unsignedp != TYPE_UNSIGNED (outer_type)))
-+ return NULL_TREE;
- if (!*preversep ? !BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN : BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN)
- *pbitpos += shiftrt;
- *pbitsize -= shiftrt;
-@@ -8512,13 +8524,25 @@ fold_truth_andor_for_ifcombine (enum tree_code code, tree truth_type,
- and bit position. */
- if (l_const.get_precision ())
- {
-+ /* Before clipping upper bits of the right-hand operand of the compare,
-+ check that they're sign or zero extensions, depending on how the
-+ left-hand operand would be extended. */
-+ bool l_non_ext_bits = false;
-+ if (ll_bitsize < lr_bitsize)
-+ {
-+ wide_int zext = wi::zext (l_const, ll_bitsize);
-+ if ((ll_unsignedp ? zext : wi::sext (l_const, ll_bitsize)) == l_const)
-+ l_const = zext;
-+ else
-+ l_non_ext_bits = true;
-+ }
- /* We're doing bitwise equality tests, so don't bother with sign
- extensions. */
- l_const = wide_int::from (l_const, lnprec, UNSIGNED);
- if (ll_and_mask.get_precision ())
- l_const &= wide_int::from (ll_and_mask, lnprec, UNSIGNED);
- l_const <<= xll_bitpos;
-- if ((l_const & ~ll_mask) != 0)
-+ if (l_non_ext_bits || (l_const & ~ll_mask) != 0)
- {
- warning_at (lloc, OPT_Wtautological_compare,
- "comparison is always %d", wanted_code == NE_EXPR);
-@@ -8530,11 +8554,23 @@ fold_truth_andor_for_ifcombine (enum tree_code code, tree truth_type,
- again. */
- gcc_checking_assert (r_const.get_precision ());
-
-+ /* Before clipping upper bits of the right-hand operand of the compare,
-+ check that they're sign or zero extensions, depending on how the
-+ left-hand operand would be extended. */
-+ bool r_non_ext_bits = false;
-+ if (rl_bitsize < rr_bitsize)
-+ {
-+ wide_int zext = wi::zext (r_const, rl_bitsize);
-+ if ((rl_unsignedp ? zext : wi::sext (r_const, rl_bitsize)) == r_const)
-+ r_const = zext;
-+ else
-+ r_non_ext_bits = true;
-+ }
- r_const = wide_int::from (r_const, lnprec, UNSIGNED);
- if (rl_and_mask.get_precision ())
- r_const &= wide_int::from (rl_and_mask, lnprec, UNSIGNED);
- r_const <<= xrl_bitpos;
-- if ((r_const & ~rl_mask) != 0)
-+ if (r_non_ext_bits || (r_const & ~rl_mask) != 0)
- {
- warning_at (rloc, OPT_Wtautological_compare,
- "comparison is always %d", wanted_code == NE_EXPR);
-diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/field-merge-21.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/field-merge-21.c
-new file mode 100644
-index 000000000000..042b2123eb63
---- /dev/null
-+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/field-merge-21.c
-@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
-+/* { dg-do run } */
-+/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
-+
-+/* PR tree-optimization/118456 */
-+/* Check that shifted fields compared with a constants compare correctly even
-+ if the constant contains sign-extension bits not present in the bit
-+ range. */
-+
-+struct S { unsigned long long o; unsigned short a, b; } s;
-+
-+__attribute__((noipa)) int
-+foo (void)
-+{
-+ return ((unsigned char) s.a) >> 3 == 17 && ((signed char) s.b) >> 2 == -27;
-+}
-+
-+__attribute__((noipa)) int
-+bar (void)
-+{
-+ return ((unsigned char) s.a) >> 3 == 17 && ((signed char) s.b) >> 2 == -91;
-+}
-+
-+__attribute__((noipa)) int
-+bars (void)
-+{
-+ return ((unsigned char) s.a) >> 3 == 17 && ((signed char) s.b) >> 2 == 37;
-+}
-+
-+__attribute__((noipa)) int
-+baz (void)
-+{
-+ return ((unsigned char) s.a) >> 3 == 49 && ((signed char) s.b) >> 2 == -27;
-+}
-+
-+__attribute__((noipa)) int
-+bazs (void)
-+{
-+ return ((unsigned char) s.a) >> 3 == (unsigned char) -15 && ((signed char) s.b) >> 2 == -27;
-+}
-+
-+int
-+main ()
-+{
-+ s.a = 17 << 3;
-+ s.b = (unsigned short)(-27u << 2);
-+ if (foo () != 1
-+ || bar () != 0
-+ || bars () != 0
-+ || baz () != 0
-+ || bazs () != 0)
-+ __builtin_abort ();
-+ return 0;
-+}
-diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/field-merge-22.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/field-merge-22.c
-new file mode 100644
-index 000000000000..45b29c0bccaf
---- /dev/null
-+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/field-merge-22.c
-@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
-+/* { dg-do run } */
-+/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
-+
-+/* PR tree-optimization/118456 */
-+/* Check that compares with constants take into account sign/zero extension of
-+ both the bitfield and of the shifting type. */
-+
-+#define shift (__CHAR_BIT__ - 4)
-+
-+struct S {
-+ signed char a : shift + 2;
-+ signed char b : shift + 2;
-+ short ignore[0];
-+} s;
-+
-+__attribute__((noipa)) int
-+foo (void)
-+{
-+ return ((unsigned char) s.a) >> shift == 15
-+ && ((unsigned char) s.b) >> shift == 0;
-+}
-+
-+int
-+main ()
-+{
-+ s.a = -1;
-+ s.b = 1;
-+ if (foo () != 1)
-+ __builtin_abort ();
-+ return 0;
-+}
-
-base-commit: 31c3c1a83fd885b4687c9f6f7acd68af76d758d3
---
-2.48.0
-
diff --git a/15.0.0/gentoo/README.history b/15.0.0/gentoo/README.history
index 0607277..02c646e 100644
--- a/15.0.0/gentoo/README.history
+++ b/15.0.0/gentoo/README.history
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
41 ????
+ - 84_all_PR118456-check-and-extend-constants-to-compare-with-bitfields.patch
- 86_all_PR118418-Fix-build-for-STORE_FLAG_VALUE-0-targets.patch
40 14 January 2025
next reply other threads:[~2025-01-14 16:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 149+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-14 16:22 Sam James [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-01-26 22:52 [gentoo-commits] proj/gcc-patches:master commit in: 15.0.0/gentoo/ Sam James
2025-01-22 16:27 Sam James
2025-01-19 22:43 Sam James
2025-01-16 23:11 Sam James
2025-01-16 23:11 Sam James
2025-01-15 11:41 Sam James
2025-01-14 15:06 Sam James
2025-01-14 15:06 Sam James
2025-01-14 12:29 Sam James
2025-01-14 8:43 Sam James
2025-01-14 8:40 Sam James
2025-01-13 13:58 Sam James
2025-01-13 6:00 Sam James
2025-01-13 3:40 Sam James
2025-01-13 3:23 Sam James
2025-01-13 3:20 Sam James
2025-01-13 0:20 Sam James
2025-01-12 18:53 Sam James
2025-01-11 12:53 Sam James
2025-01-08 21:51 Sam James
2025-01-06 10:50 Sam James
2025-01-06 10:03 Sam James
2025-01-06 4:49 Sam James
2025-01-06 4:44 Sam James
2025-01-06 4:13 Sam James
2025-01-06 4:13 Sam James
2025-01-06 4:13 Sam James
2025-01-06 4:03 Sam James
2025-01-05 23:19 Sam James
2025-01-03 3:07 Sam James
2024-12-30 1:05 Sam James
2024-12-29 10:00 Sam James
2024-12-27 15:14 Sam James
2024-12-24 20:48 Sam James
2024-12-22 22:46 Sam James
2024-12-20 11:25 Sam James
2024-12-20 5:57 Sam James
2024-12-20 1:55 Sam James
2024-12-19 18:34 Sam James
2024-12-13 13:23 Sam James
2024-12-13 11:52 Sam James
2024-12-13 5:08 Sam James
2024-12-12 12:28 Sam James
2024-12-11 4:41 Sam James
2024-12-11 0:58 Sam James
2024-12-10 19:19 Sam James
2024-12-10 14:55 Sam James
2024-12-10 5:19 Sam James
2024-12-10 5:13 Sam James
2024-12-10 5:11 Sam James
2024-12-10 5:07 Sam James
2024-12-09 3:05 Sam James
2024-12-08 22:41 Sam James
2024-12-06 17:33 Sam James
2024-12-04 20:40 Sam James
2024-12-01 22:51 Sam James
2024-12-01 22:51 Sam James
2024-11-30 11:30 Sam James
2024-11-27 17:42 Sam James
2024-11-25 15:10 Sam James
2024-11-25 3:01 Sam James
2024-11-25 3:00 Sam James
2024-11-25 3:00 Sam James
2024-11-24 22:42 Sam James
2024-11-18 17:25 Sam James
2024-11-18 10:42 Sam James
2024-11-18 10:42 Sam James
2024-11-18 9:25 Sam James
2024-11-18 9:25 Sam James
2024-11-14 18:38 Sam James
2024-11-13 4:26 Sam James
2024-11-13 0:16 Sam James
2024-11-12 2:33 Sam James
2024-11-11 19:46 Sam James
2024-11-11 19:46 Sam James
2024-11-10 22:41 Sam James
2024-11-09 16:24 Sam James
2024-11-09 7:55 Sam James
2024-11-08 8:22 Sam James
2024-11-07 16:13 Sam James
2024-11-03 23:16 Sam James
2024-11-01 8:24 Sam James
2024-11-01 8:24 Sam James
2024-11-01 8:18 Sam James
2024-11-01 8:17 Sam James
2024-10-30 16:03 Sam James
2024-10-29 19:17 Sam James
2024-10-28 21:32 Sam James
2024-10-28 8:09 Sam James
2024-10-23 15:40 Sam James
2024-10-22 19:09 Sam James
2024-10-22 18:34 Sam James
2024-10-21 12:33 Sam James
2024-10-21 12:27 Sam James
2024-10-21 12:26 Sam James
2024-10-21 11:45 Sam James
2024-10-20 22:42 Sam James
2024-10-18 14:05 Sam James
2024-10-18 10:35 Sam James
2024-10-17 23:33 Sam James
2024-10-17 23:03 Sam James
2024-10-17 5:01 Sam James
2024-10-17 4:15 Sam James
2024-10-13 22:48 Sam James
2024-10-07 2:45 Sam James
2024-10-04 10:37 Sam James
2024-10-04 9:28 Sam James
2024-10-02 19:45 Sam James
2024-09-30 14:05 Sam James
2024-09-29 22:56 Sam James
2024-09-24 1:41 Sam James
2024-09-23 15:23 Sam James
2024-09-02 2:28 Sam James
2024-08-26 13:44 Sam James
2024-08-26 6:24 Sam James
2024-08-23 13:51 Sam James
2024-08-20 20:31 Sam James
2024-08-19 18:43 Sam James
2024-08-14 9:48 Sam James
2024-08-14 2:57 Sam James
2024-08-11 22:40 Sam James
2024-08-09 19:54 Sam James
2024-08-09 19:54 Sam James
2024-08-09 19:47 Sam James
2024-08-09 19:25 Sam James
2024-08-08 11:10 Sam James
2024-08-08 11:06 Sam James
2024-08-08 11:03 Sam James
2024-08-05 9:09 Sam James
2024-08-05 1:54 Sam James
2024-08-05 1:51 Sam James
2024-08-02 20:39 Sam James
2024-08-01 14:40 Sam James
2024-07-28 23:34 Sam James
2024-07-22 1:11 Sam James
2024-07-19 11:14 Sam James
2024-07-18 0:45 Sam James
2024-07-14 23:36 Sam James
2024-06-28 12:49 Sam James
2024-06-27 0:02 Sam James
2024-06-26 23:57 Sam James
2024-06-16 22:45 Sam James
2024-06-10 20:18 Sam James
2024-06-10 17:28 Sam James
2024-06-10 17:28 Sam James
2024-06-10 2:08 Sam James
2024-06-08 17:03 Sam James
2024-06-08 17:03 Sam James
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1736871737.5c4e50d6f18794b3bece70beadb05d256087f45d.sam@gentoo \
--to=sam@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-commits@lists.gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox