[gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: net-misc/sslh/

["Sam James" <sam@gentoo.org>]

commit:     bcc3644e264bd94c941f10a6a43834b260a4fcea
Author:     Sam James <sam <AT> gentoo <DOT> org>
AuthorDate: Thu Jul 27 11:45:03 2023 +0000
Commit:     Sam James <sam <AT> gentoo <DOT> org>
CommitDate: Thu Jul 27 11:45:28 2023 +0000
URL:        https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=bcc3644e

net-misc/sslh: build with LFS

Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/911261
Thanks-to: Allen Webb <allenwebb <AT> google.com>
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam <AT> gentoo.org>

 net-misc/sslh/{sslh-1.22c.ebuild => sslh-1.22c-r1.ebuild} | 4 +++-
 net-misc/sslh/sslh-9999.ebuild                            | 4 +++-
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net-misc/sslh/sslh-1.22c.ebuild b/net-misc/sslh/sslh-1.22c-r1.ebuild
similarity index 97%
rename from net-misc/sslh/sslh-1.22c.ebuild
rename to net-misc/sslh/sslh-1.22c-r1.ebuild
index e757173655e9..b228c7d0c9de 100644
--- a/net-misc/sslh/sslh-1.22c.ebuild
+++ b/net-misc/sslh/sslh-1.22c-r1.ebuild
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-# Copyright 1999-2022 Gentoo Authors
+# Copyright 1999-2023 Gentoo Authors
 # Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
 
 EAPI="7"
@@ -39,6 +39,8 @@ src_prepare() {
 }
 
 src_compile() {
+	append-lfs-flags
+
 	# On older versions of GCC, the default gnu89 variant
 	# will reject within-for-loop initializers, bug #595426
 	# Furthermore, we need to use the gnu variant (gnu99) instead

diff --git a/net-misc/sslh/sslh-9999.ebuild b/net-misc/sslh/sslh-9999.ebuild
index 9ecf187a6416..d00e3490d2df 100644
--- a/net-misc/sslh/sslh-9999.ebuild
+++ b/net-misc/sslh/sslh-9999.ebuild
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-# Copyright 1999-2021 Gentoo Authors
+# Copyright 1999-2023 Gentoo Authors
 # Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
 
 EAPI="7"
@@ -39,6 +39,8 @@ src_prepare() {
 }
 
 src_compile() {
+	append-lfs-flags
+
 	# On older versions of GCC, the default gnu89 variant
 	# will reject within-for-loop initializers, bug #595426
 	# Furthermore, we need to use the gnu variant (gnu99) instead