public inbox for gentoo-cluster@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-cluster@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-cluster] examples of (large) Gentoo clusters
Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2006 10:29:00 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4579AEEC.8020401@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17785.29757.683233.632715@gs105.sicortex.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2216 bytes --]

John R. Dunning wrote:
>     From: Bryan Green <bgreen@nas.nasa.gov>
> A longer term solution is to do some combination of remodularizing vfs and
> recasting the lustre stuff so as to depend less on getting its fingers into
> the guts.  I once spent some time looking into that, and I do believe it's
> possible, but it would take some work, and would really need to be done in
> concert with the rest of the core kernel guys, and I ran out of time to pursue
> it.  In the meantime, the more the gentoo community can resist the temptation
> to patch the kernel (at least the vfs parts of it), the easier it will be to
> add lustre.

> Based on what you've said, I wouldn't fool around with SLES, I'd just figure
> out what close-to-vanilla kernel you want to start from (picking one you think
> you can live with for a while) and do some part of what I described above.
> You might have a somewhat easier time of it if you started with 2.6.18, as I
> believe there's a cfs-supplied patchset for that one.  If you want to start
> from a gentoo 2.6.18 one, I suspect your task will be to start with vanilla,
> make that work, then work out how to re-apply the gentoo patches.  Re getting
> cfs to help, my bet would be that you'll have an easier time getting the
> gentoo community to create patches that are amenable to going on top of a
> lustre-ized vanilla kernel (and relying on cfs to support vanilla kernels)
> than you will getting cfs to generate patches to go on top of gentoo.  If you
> watch the lustre lists, you'll see more people asking for vanilla than are
> asking for gentoo.

I've just got a couple comments on this.

* The gentoo-sources patches are almost all upstream and based on the
W.X.Y.Z "stable release" patchsets, except for 2-3 cases that probably
aren't relevant to clusters. As a result, Gentoo folks would be
reasonably well off just running vanilla-sources, which groups them in
with everyone else wanting Lustre on a vanilla kernel.

* Normally I would recommend hardened-sources for anything resembling a
server, but you should have all your nodes and file servers blocked off
from the Internet anyway so that's a non-issue.

Thanks,
Donnie


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 249 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-12-08 18:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-12-01 23:16 [gentoo-cluster] examples of (large) Gentoo clusters Bryan Green
2006-12-02  3:48 ` Donnie Berkholz
2006-12-02 13:54   ` Hanni Ali
2006-12-02 18:12     ` Bryan Green
2006-12-02 17:57   ` Bryan Green
2006-12-02 19:51     ` Philipp Riegger
2006-12-03  3:49     ` Donnie Berkholz
2006-12-04 18:15       ` Bryan Green
2006-12-04 20:53         ` Donnie Berkholz
2006-12-04 22:35           ` Hanni Ali
2006-12-04 23:00           ` Bryan Green
2006-12-04 23:55             ` Daniel van Ham Colchete
2006-12-05  3:55               ` Donnie Berkholz
2006-12-05 13:18               ` John R. Dunning
2006-12-05 16:25                 ` Bryan Green
2006-12-05 21:15                 ` Daniel van Ham Colchete
2006-12-05 21:22                   ` Bryan Green
2006-12-05 21:28                   ` John R. Dunning
2006-12-07  0:33                     ` Bryan Green
2006-12-07 13:12                       ` John R. Dunning
2006-12-08  3:56                         ` Bryan Green
2006-12-08 14:18                           ` John R. Dunning
2006-12-08 17:15                             ` Bryan Green
2006-12-11 13:38                               ` John R. Dunning
2006-12-08 18:29                             ` Donnie Berkholz [this message]
2006-12-08 18:52                               ` Bryan Green
2006-12-08 19:10                               ` John R. Dunning
2006-12-11 19:44                             ` Bryan Green
2006-12-02 14:40 ` Nick Anderson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4579AEEC.8020401@gentoo.org \
    --to=dberkholz@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-cluster@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox