From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HrGGF-0007UC-KW for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 24 May 2007 16:34:00 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l4OGXD0w026537; Thu, 24 May 2007 16:33:13 GMT Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.251]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l4OGXA9l026532 for ; Thu, 24 May 2007 16:33:12 GMT Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c8so80675ana for ; Thu, 24 May 2007 09:33:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Z4Q5/U/KmJsBexqwUtS/CHIajY8+HKZGxXSXyw/L66D5bN5eNM4G0+HlOgHDh1qemOLRN4k0Lnm+ty+7P9wh7StME6/8btLRQaTQWWqfgyE+Z09w8XpFs2YozBK6uL+YExigX9IyaFsLOAiT/frMvgMETTldZFGJt8kBa/355Fg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=oCszwRNKdezZeGTYbAn3O457D4Kkg3Lowaer3XMXHVPdPjdUJbBLUQtJAyMs/nQgbm8xra0GeYQSuNnH1TT5GUp0qgNVAypXsXXyWfcZehTjhV032XCK2YeC27UdUZXgm1w2ps4oK5SHJNthggtYqlTT0pzjN5h54dGYBypoda0= Received: by 10.114.108.15 with SMTP id g15mr982807wac.1180024390069; Thu, 24 May 2007 09:33:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.115.111.5 with HTTP; Thu, 24 May 2007 09:33:09 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3f85ef270705240933o30b43b7bp1cabbf7f91c6361b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 17:33:09 +0100 From: "=?UTF-8?Q?Jos=C3=A9_Costa?=" To: gentoo-cluster@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-cluster] openmosix In-Reply-To: <4655B8BC.3000802@cs.cmu.edu> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-cluster@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-cluster@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <6763832255B40844894F2C905CE2852F2EFBF4@minnicksbs.MinnickWeb.loc> <4655B8BC.3000802@cs.cmu.edu> X-Archives-Salt: ee8698d0-146b-406c-bbd2-f0b1043c5455 X-Archives-Hash: 1294881e65d4c44f391b17dec6fb5b7c Well, have you tried with Linux-HA using Xen OCF Resource Agent? On 5/24/07, Ted Rodgers wrote: > Joshua Morris wrote: > > What other alternatives are there? Can anyone share their installation > > tips and help some of us that are new to clustering but familiar with > > Gentoo. I am looking to build something when I can run multiple vm's on > > a cluster and load balance the vm's across the cluster. Anyone doing > > anything similar to this? > > > > Thank you, > > Joshua > > > We've been asking the same question where I work. We're wanting to > re-do and increase performance in a few lab setups and thought openmosix > would be a great option. If there aren't tools available for a 2.6 > kernel, we may have to keep using the current setup: NIS / NFS / autofs > / afs setup with users loging in to specific machines. One group tried > condor, but really isn't happy with it at all. > > Any suggestions? > > Ted Rodgers > Robotics, CMU > -- > gentoo-cluster@gentoo.org mailing list > > -- gentoo-cluster@gentoo.org mailing list