From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FTPbc-0006Oi-Tc for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2006 20:36:57 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.5) with SMTP id k3BKagIj015155; Tue, 11 Apr 2006 20:36:42 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k3BKafRt024202 for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2006 20:36:42 GMT Received: from alamentin-104-1-5-252.w81-248.abo.wanadoo.fr ([81.248.12.252] helo=serveur1.novazur.fr) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FTPbN-0004S8-Gf for gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2006 20:36:41 +0000 Received: by serveur1.novazur.fr (Postfix, from userid 9) id 171C1260F61; Tue, 11 Apr 2006 16:36:40 -0400 (AST) To: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org Path: not-for-mail From: Christophe PEREZ Newsgroups: gmane.linux.gentoo.catalyst Subject: [gentoo-catalyst] Re: Re: problem with distcc Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 16:36:39 -0400 Organization: KanelXP Message-ID: References: <1144779958.14010.1.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> <443C0D9D.9030609@gentoo.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: kanelxp.novazur.fr Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-catalyst@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: serveur1.novazur.fr 1144787799 24143 192.168.0.1 (11 Apr 2006 20:36:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.novazur.fr NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 20:36:39 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Pan/0.14.2.91 (As She Crawled Across the Table) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 4d998152-c623-4fa2-a2f3-e40d22f67af0 X-Archives-Hash: 939d7dcfc8f6c3c888111d77742c0ee3 Le Tue, 11 Apr 2006 15:12:13 -0500, Andrew Gaffney a =E9crit=A0: > You know, it doesn't make much sense to build an up to date stage1. A s= tage1=20 > install recompiles everything anyway, so why not just use the 2006.0 st= age1 tarball? I know, but : 1) as you could read, I didn't find a another solution 2) if I want a portage uptodate, I don't have another choice, no ? > As for your actual problem, it's because you're using a i586-pc-linux-g= nu CHOST=20 > for the catalyst build while (I bet) all of your distcc helpers are=20 > i686-pc-linux-gnu. Yes. > When the build is distributed, it'll look for=20 > i586-pc-linux-gnu-gcc, which won't exist on the helpers, which will ret= urn a=20 > code 110. And the solution is ? --=20 Christophe PEREZ -- gentoo-catalyst@gentoo.org mailing list