[gentoo-catalyst] problem with distcc

[gentoo-catalyst] problem with distcc

[Christophe PEREZ]

Hi,

Back to the list after nearly one year (Hi chris ! :-) ).
Today, I'm trying to make another livecd.

I've tried first to build something complete, like I have done the first
time : my snapshot, my stage1 etc... But I was already stopped on stage1.

So, I tried something more "normal", using gentoo stage3 + portage
snapshot to build my livecd-stage1 :
http://mirror.datapipe.net/gentoo/releases/x86/2006.0/stages/stage3-i586-2006.0.tar.bz2
http://mirror.datapipe.net/gentoo/releases/snapshots/2006.0/portage-20060123.tar.bz2

It seems to build correctly, but it doesn't use distcc, and I'd
like a lot to use it to win time.

Version : dev-util/catalyst-2.0_rc41

/etc/catalyst2.conf :

distdir="/usr/portage/distfiles"
options="autoresume ccache kerncache pkgcache seedcache snapcache distcc"
sharedir="/usr/lib/catalyst2"
storedir="/sauve_loc/catalyst2"
snapshot_cache="/sauve_loc/catalyst2/snapshot_cache"
hash_function="md5"
digests="md5 sha1"

My livecd-stage1 :

subarch: i586
version_stamp: cp20060411
target: livecd-stage1
rel_type: default
profile: default-linux/x86/2006.0
snapshot: 20060123
source_subpath: stage3-i586-2006.0
distcc_hosts: localhost 192.168.0.101 192.168.0.201 192.168.0.30
portage_confdir: /etc/catalyst2/portage
livecd/use:
        -*
        X
        gtk
        ipv6
        socks5
        livecd
        fbcon
        ssl
        a52
        aac
        aalib
        acpi
        alsa
        audiofile
        avi
        bash-completion
        bitmap-fonts
        bmp
        bonobo
        cdb
        cdparanoia
        cdr
        crypt
        curl
        dvd
        dvdr
        dvdread
        exif
        ffmpeg
        flac
        gif
        gphoto2
        gtk2
        gtkhtml
        hal
        imagemagick
        imlib
        java
        jpeg
        libg++
        libwww
        mad
        matroska
        mmx
        mng
        mp3
        mpeg
        ncurses
        odbc
        ogg
        oggvorbis
        opengl
        oss
        perl
        png
        sdl
        sox
        spell
        speex
        sse
        svga
        theora
        tiff
        truetype
        truetype-fonts
        type1-fonts
        unicode
        usb
        v4l
        vorbis
        wmf
        xinerama
        xmms
        xpm
        xv
        xvid
        linguas_fr
livecd/packages:
        baselayout
        livecd-tools
        module-init-tools
        dhcpcd
        acpid
        gentoo-sources
        coldplug
        fxload
        dosfstools
        ntfsprogs
        nfs-utils
        usbutils
        pciutils
        e2fsprogs
        pwgen
        rp-pppoe
        penggy
        iputils
        hwsetup
        pptpclient
        ethtool
        wireless-tools
        prism54-firmware
        wpa_supplicant
        genkernel
        less
        xorg-x11
        pkgconfig
        aspell-fr
        alsa-utils
        grisbi
        blackdown-jdk
        openoffice-bin
        ntp
        ivman
        xfce4
        xfce4-extras
        liferea
        rox
        gftp
        gedit
        gpdf
        eog
        gimp
        gqview
        grip
        gaim
        xbindkeys
        realplayer
        libstdc++-v3
        mozilla-firefox
        evolution
        pan
        xmms
        mplayer
        mplayerplug-in

# ls -l /sauve_loc/catalyst2/snapshots/portage-20060123.tar.bz2 /sauve_loc/catalyst2/builds/stage3-i586-2006.0.tar.bz2
-rw-r--r--  1 root root 104713233 fév 25 16:24 /sauve_loc/catalyst2/builds/stage3-i586-2006.0.tar.bz2
-rw-r--r--  1 root root  22597458 mar 19 10:51 /sauve_loc/catalyst2/snapshots/portage-20060123.tar.bz2

Thanks in advance.

PS : and always sorry for my bad english.

-- 
Christophe PEREZ
--
gentoo-catalyst@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-catalyst] problem with distcc

[Chris Gianelloni]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 481 bytes --]

On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 11:12 -0400, Christophe PEREZ wrote:
> It seems to build correctly, but it doesn't use distcc, and I'd
> like a lot to use it to win time.

What do you mean that it doesn't use distcc?  How do you know?  Have you
increased MAKEOPTS anywhere?  Remember that the default MAKEOPTS is -j2,
which is unlikely to distribute very far... ;]

-- 
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead
x86 Architecture Team
Games - Developer
Gentoo Linux

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 191 bytes --]

[gentoo-catalyst] Re: problem with distcc

[Christophe PEREZ]

Le Tue, 11 Apr 2006 14:25:58 -0400, Chris Gianelloni a écrit :

> What do you mean that it doesn't use distcc?

Only localhost[0] is used.

> How do you know?

#
DISTCC_DIR="/sauve_loc/catalyst2/tmp/default/livecd-stage1-i586-cp20060411/var/tmp/portage/.distcc/"
distccmon-text 1 | grep -v "^$"  

only gives lines like :
922  Compile     pngpread.tmp.KanelXP.918.i   localhost[0]

nothing else.

> Have you increased MAKEOPTS anywhere?

No :-(

Before, I had a catalyst-env.sh
(envscript="/etc/catalyst2/catalyst-env.sh") with :
export MAKEOPTS="-j7"
export LINGUAS="fr"
export LANGUAGE="FREN"

but, as it doesn't work.
I always have errors :
cd ../obj_s;  i586-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I../ncurses -I/var/tmp/portage/ncurses-5.4-r6/work/ncurses-5.4/ncurses -I/var/tmp/portage/ncurses-5.4-r6/work/ncurses-5.4/ncurses/../include -I. -I../include  -D_GNU_SOURCE -DNDEBUG -O2 -march=i586 -pipe -fPIC -c /var/tmp/portage/ncurses-5.4-r6/work/ncurses-5.4/ncurses/base/lib_chgat.c
distcc[13193] ERROR: compile /var/tmp/portage/ncurses-5.4-r6/work/ncurses-5.4/ncurses/tty/hashmap.c on 192.168.0.101 failed with exit code 110
make[1]: *** [../obj_s/hashmap.o] Error 110
make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
distcc[13246] ERROR: compile /var/tmp/ccache/lib_bkgd.tmp.KanelXP.13204.i on 192.168.0.101 failed with exit code 110
distcc[13204] ERROR: compile /var/tmp/portage/ncurses-5.4-r6/work/ncurses-5.4/ncurses/base/lib_bkgd.c on 192.168.0.101 failed with exit code 110
make[1]: *** [../obj_s/lib_bkgd.o] Error 110
make: *** [all] Error 2

!!! ERROR: sys-libs/ncurses-5.4-r6 failed.
!!! Function do_compile, Line 89, Exitcode 2
!!! make failed
!!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, NOT this status message.


seems du to distcc, no ?

That's why I removed envscript=, but I may forgot the MAKEOPTS.
What is the right way to define this MAKEOPTS ?

> Remember that the default MAKEOPTS is -j2,
> which is unlikely to distribute very far... ;]

Of course, sorry.

-- 
Christophe PEREZ
--
gentoo-catalyst@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-catalyst] Re: problem with distcc

[Christophe PEREZ]

Le Tue, 11 Apr 2006 15:17:43 -0400, Christophe PEREZ a écrit :

> seems du to distcc, no ?

Maybe because of gcc versions ?
3.3.4 in stage3 and 3.4.5-r1 on my machines ?

So, what is the solution ?
build my own stage1/stage2/stage3 to have the same gcc ?

And, have I to disable distcc to build stage1 ?
When will I enable it ? for stage2 build ?

I ask all of that because that's how I started yesterday, but stage1 build
failed during the night...

-- 
Christophe PEREZ
--
gentoo-catalyst@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-catalyst] Re: problem with distcc

[Andrew Gaffney]

Christophe PEREZ wrote:
> distcc[13246] ERROR: compile /var/tmp/ccache/lib_bkgd.tmp.KanelXP.13204.i on 192.168.0.101 failed with exit code 110

This usually means that it can't find the compiler named by the client. Is the 
CHOST on 192.168.0.101 different that that of the catalyst build you're doing? 
If so, you need to build a cross-compiler (or just create some symlinks if it's 
the same arch (all x86)).

-- 
Andrew Gaffney                            http://dev.gentoo.org/~agaffney/
Gentoo Linux Developer                                   Installer Project

-- 
gentoo-catalyst@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-catalyst] Re: problem with distcc

[Christophe PEREZ]

Le Tue, 11 Apr 2006 15:35:57 -0400, Christophe PEREZ a écrit :

> I ask all of that because that's how I started yesterday, but stage1 build
> failed during the night...

I tried again, with 
# cat stage1-060410.spec
subarch: i586
target: stage1
version_stamp: 20060410
rel_type: default
profile: default-linux/x86/2006.0
snapshot: 20060410
source_subpath: stage3-i586-2006.0
distcc_hosts: localhost 192.168.0.101 192.168.0.201 192.168.0.30 192.168.0.6

And it fails during the first compile :
>>> emerge (1 of 66) sys-devel/patch-2.5.9 to /
[...]
i586-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -c  -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -Ded_PROGRAM=\"ed\" -I. -I. -O2 -march=i586 -pipe -DLINUX -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 getopt.c
i586-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -c  -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -Ded_PROGRAM=\"ed\" -I. -I. -O2 -march=i586 -pipe -DLINUX -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 getopt1.c
distcc[8533] ERROR: compile /var/tmp/ccache/addext.tmp.KanelXP.8506.i on 192.168.0.101 failed with exit code 110
distcc[8506] ERROR: compile addext.c on 192.168.0.101 failed with exit code 110
make: *** [addext.o] Error 110
make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
distcc[8538] ERROR: compile /var/tmp/ccache/backupfile.tmp.KanelXP.8513.i on 192.168.0.101 failed with exit code 110
distcc[8542] ERROR: compile /var/tmp/ccache/argmatch.tmp.KanelXP.8510.i on 192.168.0.101 failed with exit code 110
distcc[8537] ERROR: compile /var/tmp/ccache/getopt.tmp.KanelXP.8517.i on 192.168.0.201 failed with exit code 110
distcc[8517] ERROR: compile getopt.c on 192.168.0.201 failed with exit code 110
make: *** [getopt.o] Error 110

!!! ERROR: sys-devel/patch-2.5.9 failed.
!!! Function src_compile, Line 29, Exitcode 2
!!! emake failed
!!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, NOT this status message.


!!! catalyst: run script failed.

I'll try again without distcc for building stage1.
But, if it works, I'm curious to know the real right way to do it ?

-- 
Christophe PEREZ
--
gentoo-catalyst@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-catalyst] Re: problem with distcc

[Andrew Gaffney]

Christophe PEREZ wrote:
> Le Tue, 11 Apr 2006 15:35:57 -0400, Christophe PEREZ a écrit :
> 
>> I ask all of that because that's how I started yesterday, but stage1 build
>> failed during the night...
> 
> I tried again, with 
> # cat stage1-060410.spec
> subarch: i586
> target: stage1

You know, it doesn't make much sense to build an up to date stage1. A stage1 
install recompiles everything anyway, so why not just use the 2006.0 stage1 tarball?

As for your actual problem, it's because you're using a i586-pc-linux-gnu CHOST 
for the catalyst build while (I bet) all of your distcc helpers are 
i686-pc-linux-gnu. When the build is distributed, it'll look for 
i586-pc-linux-gnu-gcc, which won't exist on the helpers, which will return a 
code 110.

-- 
Andrew Gaffney                            http://dev.gentoo.org/~agaffney/
Gentoo Linux Developer                                   Installer Project

-- 
gentoo-catalyst@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-catalyst] Re: problem with distcc

[Chris Gianelloni]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 579 bytes --]

On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 16:07 -0400, Christophe PEREZ wrote:
> I'll try again without distcc for building stage1.
> But, if it works, I'm curious to know the real right way to do it ?

It works perfectly provided you have;

same compiler versions
same compiler names

What this means is for you to build a CHOST=i586-pc-linux-gnu machine,
you are *required* to have a cross-compiler that is named
i586-pc-linux-gnu-gcc on each of your distcc slaves.

-- 
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead
x86 Architecture Team
Games - Developer
Gentoo Linux

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 191 bytes --]

[gentoo-catalyst] Re: Re: problem with distcc

[Christophe PEREZ]

Le Tue, 11 Apr 2006 15:12:13 -0500, Andrew Gaffney a écrit :

> You know, it doesn't make much sense to build an up to date stage1. A stage1 
> install recompiles everything anyway, so why not just use the 2006.0 stage1 tarball?

I know, but :
1) as you could read, I didn't find a another solution
2) if I want a portage uptodate, I don't have another choice, no ?

> As for your actual problem, it's because you're using a i586-pc-linux-gnu CHOST 
> for the catalyst build while (I bet) all of your distcc helpers are 
> i686-pc-linux-gnu.

Yes.

> When the build is distributed, it'll look for 
> i586-pc-linux-gnu-gcc, which won't exist on the helpers, which will return a 
> code 110.

And the solution is ?

-- 
Christophe PEREZ
--
gentoo-catalyst@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-catalyst] Re: Re: problem with distcc

[Christophe PEREZ]

Le Tue, 11 Apr 2006 16:22:25 -0400, Chris Gianelloni a écrit :

> What this means is for you to build a CHOST=i586-pc-linux-gnu machine,
> you are *required* to have a cross-compiler that is named
> i586-pc-linux-gnu-gcc on each of your distcc slaves.

Ah, ok, so I have to find out what I have to change to have that...
I'm really not used with cross-compile.

May be I have more chance changing i586 to i686 ?

-- 
Christophe PEREZ
--
gentoo-catalyst@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-catalyst] Re: Re: problem with distcc

[Christophe PEREZ]

Le Tue, 11 Apr 2006 16:39:17 -0400, Christophe PEREZ a écrit :

> May be I have more chance changing i586 to i686 ?

If fact, the real question is :
What arch to choose to have the livecd working on most PCs (others than
mine) ?
(all my distcc slaves are CHOST="i686-pc-linux-gnu")


-----------------------

Le Tue, 11 Apr 2006 16:36:39 -0400, Christophe PEREZ a écrit :

>> When the build is distributed, it'll look for 
>> i586-pc-linux-gnu-gcc, which won't exist on the helpers, which will return a 
>> code 110.
> 
> And the solution is ?

Ok, understood now (with another post), cross-compile is the solution.

-- 
Christophe PEREZ
--
gentoo-catalyst@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-catalyst] Re: Re: problem with distcc

[Chris Gianelloni]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 546 bytes --]

On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 16:57 -0400, Christophe PEREZ wrote:
> Le Tue, 11 Apr 2006 16:39:17 -0400, Christophe PEREZ a écrit :
> 
> > May be I have more chance changing i586 to i686 ?
> 
> If fact, the real question is :
> What arch to choose to have the livecd working on most PCs (others than
> mine) ?
> (all my distcc slaves are CHOST="i686-pc-linux-gnu")

We use "x86" for the installcd and "i686" for the LiveCD.

-- 
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead
x86 Architecture Team
Games - Developer
Gentoo Linux

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 191 bytes --]

[gentoo-catalyst] Re: Re: Re: problem with distcc

[Christophe PEREZ]

Le Tue, 11 Apr 2006 17:45:44 -0400, Chris Gianelloni a écrit :

> We use "x86" for the installcd and "i686" for the LiveCD.

Ok, i686 is what I have used, and I'm compiling a livecd-stage1.
Distcc is working fine now.


Another question please.
I just need to create a livecd with some desktop softs like OOo, Gimp,
Firefox etc...
The only thing particular I need is the /home is automaticaly mounted on a
USB key (I don't want to build a liveusb because all PC can't boot on USB)
and maybe some others little personalizations.

Can I do that as I'm trying, building a livecd-stage1 then livecd-stage2,
or have I necessarily to start building at a stageX ?

I think I can use the first method, but I'm not sure...

-- 
Christophe PEREZ
--
gentoo-catalyst@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-catalyst] Re: Re: Re: problem with distcc

[Chris Gianelloni]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1063 bytes --]

On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 18:02 -0400, Christophe PEREZ wrote:
> Le Tue, 11 Apr 2006 17:45:44 -0400, Chris Gianelloni a écrit :
> 
> > We use "x86" for the installcd and "i686" for the LiveCD.
> 
> Ok, i686 is what I have used, and I'm compiling a livecd-stage1.
> Distcc is working fine now.
> 
> 
> Another question please.
> I just need to create a livecd with some desktop softs like OOo, Gimp,
> Firefox etc...
> The only thing particular I need is the /home is automaticaly mounted on a
> USB key (I don't want to build a liveusb because all PC can't boot on USB)
> and maybe some others little personalizations.
> 
> Can I do that as I'm trying, building a livecd-stage1 then livecd-stage2,
> or have I necessarily to start building at a stageX ?
> 
> I think I can use the first method, but I'm not sure...

You shouldn't ever really need to make your own stages unless you're
just wanting more up-to-date versions.

-- 
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead
x86 Architecture Team
Games - Developer
Gentoo Linux

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 191 bytes --]

[gentoo-catalyst] Re: problem with distcc

[Christophe PEREZ]

Le Wed, 12 Apr 2006 09:48:37 -0400, Chris Gianelloni a écrit :

> You shouldn't ever really need to make your own stages unless you're
> just wanting more up-to-date versions.

Ok, clear.
And, in this case, I have to build my own portage snapshot and all
stage{1,2,3}, that's right ?

======
Other thing :
Build my own portage snapshot is the only way to use an ebuild I made ?
No portage overlay system ?
I tried to define PORTDIR_OVERLAY in envscript, but I have an error :

!!! Invalid PORTDIR_OVERLAY (not a dir): /etc/catalyst2/portage-overlay


# ls /etc/catalyst2/portage-overlay/
net-misc

It would be very sad to have to build snapshot and all stages juste to
have one soft more, but may be it's the only way.

-- 
Christophe PEREZ
--
gentoo-catalyst@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-catalyst] Re: problem with distcc

[Chris Gianelloni]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1149 bytes --]

On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 11:51 -0400, Christophe PEREZ wrote:
> Le Wed, 12 Apr 2006 09:48:37 -0400, Chris Gianelloni a écrit :
> 
> > You shouldn't ever really need to make your own stages unless you're
> > just wanting more up-to-date versions.
> 
> Ok, clear.
> And, in this case, I have to build my own portage snapshot and all
> stage{1,2,3}, that's right ?

If you wanted updated stages, yes.

> ======
> Other thing :
> Build my own portage snapshot is the only way to use an ebuild I made ?
> No portage overlay system ?
> I tried to define PORTDIR_OVERLAY in envscript, but I have an error :
> 
> !!! Invalid PORTDIR_OVERLAY (not a dir): /etc/catalyst2/portage-overlay
> 
> 
> # ls /etc/catalyst2/portage-overlay/
> net-misc
> 
> It would be very sad to have to build snapshot and all stages juste to
> have one soft more, but may be it's the only way.

Ehh... Please read through /usr/share/doc/catalyst-2.0_rc*/examples
before continuing to ask questions that are already answered there... ;]

-- 
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead
x86 Architecture Team
Games - Developer
Gentoo Linux

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 191 bytes --]

[gentoo-catalyst] Re: Re: problem with distcc

[Christophe PEREZ]

Le Wed, 12 Apr 2006 16:12:55 -0400, Chris Gianelloni a écrit :

>> And, in this case, I have to build my own portage snapshot and all
>> stage{1,2,3}, that's right ?
> 
> If you wanted updated stages, yes.

Ok, and may be I need something up-to-date because now, I have an error
with pango :

>>> md5 src_uri ;-) pango-1.10.2.tar.bz2
 * Please re-emerge x11-libs/cairo with the png and X USE flags set

!!! ERROR: x11-libs/pango-1.10.2 failed.
!!! Function pkg_setup, Line 41, Exitcode 0
!!! cairo needs png and X flags set
!!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, NOT this status message.

But I do have X and png in USE.

> Ehh... Please read through /usr/share/doc/catalyst-2.0_rc*/examples
> before continuing to ask questions that are already answered there... ;]

I always search before asking here, you know.
I can see a portdir_overlay option, but only in snapshot_templace.spec.
And all I can find in others specs (livecd/root_overlay,
livecd/overlay...) don't seem to be what I need.

-- 
Christophe PEREZ
--
gentoo-catalyst@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-catalyst] Re: Re: problem with distcc

[Christophe PEREZ]

Le Wed, 12 Apr 2006 17:07:32 -0400, Christophe PEREZ a écrit :

> But I do have X and png in USE.

I'm not sure, but it seems that's because I had each USE on a line in my
spec (as I had for the first livecd), X wasn't visible (seen by a chroot
and emerge info).
With all on the same line, it's now compiling cairo again.

-- 
Christophe PEREZ
--
gentoo-catalyst@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-catalyst] Re: Re: problem with distcc

[Chris Gianelloni]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 718 bytes --]

On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 17:07 -0400, Christophe PEREZ wrote:
> I always search before asking here, you know.
> I can see a portdir_overlay option, but only in snapshot_templace.spec.
> And all I can find in others specs (livecd/root_overlay,
> livecd/overlay...) don't seem to be what I need.

GRR... It seems to be missing from the example specs now.  I've just
added it back in, so it'll be in 2.0_rc42.

Anyway, use portage-overlay in any spec file *except* snapshot.  Also,
you need to use the *exact* same overlay for all of your targets, or
else you can cause problems for yourself.

-- 
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead
x86 Architecture Team
Games - Developer
Gentoo Linux

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 191 bytes --]

[gentoo-catalyst] Re: problem with distcc

[Christophe PEREZ]

Le Thu, 13 Apr 2006 09:06:55 -0400, Chris Gianelloni a écrit :

> GRR... It seems to be missing from the example specs now.  I've just
> added it back in, so it'll be in 2.0_rc42.

Ah, I'm not so stupid... ;-)

> Anyway, use portage-overlay in any spec file *except* snapshot.

Ok !!
*portage-overlay* is the option name ? and not "portage_overlay" ?

> Also,
> you need to use the *exact* same overlay for all of your targets, or
> else you can cause problems for yourself.

Of course.
thanks.

-- 
Christophe PEREZ
--
gentoo-catalyst@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-catalyst] Re: problem with distcc

[Christophe PEREZ]

Le Thu, 13 Apr 2006 09:59:38 -0400, Christophe PEREZ a écrit :

>> Anyway, use portage-overlay in any spec file *except* snapshot.
> 
> Ok !!
> *portage-overlay* is the option name ? and not "portage_overlay" ?

I could try now, and it seems to be "portage_overlay".

-- 
Christophe PEREZ
--
gentoo-catalyst@gentoo.org mailing list