I dont think so, in fact here is the total debug output :

>>> Regenerating /etc/ld.so.cache...
 * Caching service dependencies...


Performing Global Updates: /usr/portage/profiles/updates/4Q-2004
(Could take a couple of minutes if you have a lot of binary packages.)
  .='update pass'  *='binary update'  @='/var/db move'
  s='/var/db SLOT move' S='binary SLOT move' p='update /etc/portage/package.*'
......................................s.....s.......



 ** Skipping packages. Run 'fixpackages' or set it in FEATURES to fix the
    tbz2's in the packages directory. Note: This can take a very long time.
!!! ARCH is not set... Are you missing the /etc/make.profile symlink?
!!! Is the symlink correct? Is your portage tree complete?

and my spec file in attachment.

Thanks for the replies.


On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 11:31:57 +0100, Tobias Scherbaum
<dertobi123@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-12-22 at 10:40 +0100, martin nicolas wrote:
> > !!! ARCH is not set... Are you missing the /etc/make.profile symlink?
> > !!! Is the symlink correct? Is your portage tree complete?
> >
> > but my /etc/make.profile is correctly set.
> 
> Are you using a cascading profiles enabled stage archive, but an "old"
> profile (i.e. default-x86-2004.2) in your specfile or the other way
> round?
> 
> Tobias
> 
> 
>