From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HvZTc-0007xo-N0 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 13:53:37 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l55DqVgc004950; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 13:52:31 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l55DqMEr004679 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 13:52:26 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AB6D6531F for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 13:41:35 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 required=5.5 tests=[none] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mJY8OEWlseje for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 13:41:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.168]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C25A65267 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 13:41:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id t39so169222ugd for ; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 06:41:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:message-id:cc:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=PyPqGl1Y6bg13B5yumXuzYNpAR6XLCrv5hxGoDgED4kd3ljc9hEjSr7F/px2fpFlXKS9nVVTz73jBEDHBcbfhM0LbxG74+Uv1kW2PG/ZoglRyvCNZW3C9O1CHzG0mPn/X5u+pWGipFDkhSs3NChOm8icrHlj6esVTh/HfjWkG10= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:message-id:cc:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=FxpW0h8gBUHT+g08mnFr1DbvHYOAkL4z8fDc1YgkefLAljRQ3iBafgUYm0lc0irCW95oj7d6AUlcLmBncz2QiRcxi3KHuIei/oe9EveYI1NvxzNNBATRG8TwxiJmDdqb3hfJs1zsoTDVjEpBCfcd/1atdXaO6kjFU6H6J+HfLQs= Received: by 10.82.154.12 with SMTP id b12mr8869546bue.1181050891037; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 06:41:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.1.153? ( [87.16.185.242]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i5sm3926331mue.2007.06.05.06.41.29; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 06:41:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20070601175240.4c5e244c@Bazaar> References: <3BBC4EF5-98E4-4EBE-8597-F8DC52EB0809@gmail.com> <46601250.4030603@gentoo.org> <20070601175240.4c5e244c@Bazaar> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-catalyst@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Cc: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Luca Casagrande Subject: Re: [gentoo-catalyst] unionfs and genkernel Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 15:44:35 +0200 To: Isidore Ducasse X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) X-Archives-Salt: c5a39eea-e980-460a-8cf2-44fa9eb678e5 X-Archives-Hash: 8f13c2363919d0920f07c8f11e0f11c0 Il giorno 01/giu/07, alle ore 17:52, Isidore Ducasse ha scritto: >> >> We used genkernel-3.4.8 and gentoo-sources-2.6.19-r5 for the release. > > As far as I know, unionfs doesn't work for >2.6.20 kernels. At > least not portage's ones. > aufs on the sunrise overlay seems a very interesting alternative. > Does someone know if there are plans to integrate it into standard > portage tree? > Have you tested it with 2.6.19-r5 ? Luca -- gentoo-catalyst@gentoo.org mailing list