From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD2391381F3 for ; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 14:57:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 471B4E09DD; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 14:57:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4824E09DD for ; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 14:57:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qa0-f48.google.com (mail-qa0-f48.google.com [209.85.216.48]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mattst88) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DB6CA33DEB9 for ; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 14:57:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id bn16so916771qab.14 for ; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 07:57:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=GKu8rLxoKtHbqxCHwunKNgRFxjQ/Rh2rsjeShej/eow=; b=IdNKDxa5C648yM/BAOvQfhGFolsAnQi0hV5hCzWfswXohuG12il/6GbfCvucT9JHq4 +3BXxF0C3gXxX3pDDBTbkgvqzZus6WKCYFXEZTkohMoOOk6UFC1qlQmmIcwyIrWa2sYL hLWNYofDBly+CUspW+TXV/r35l64OybXeMPw/XDc1RLAvcdEesEz5XnHqTmdD8t3QdpQ U0lPLct9oAEH4Rb24lVPvvtGxKyNMb5J5EsoghyC/xNXjjjRQJFrxHH35k8vywIJv/Sh Un6PzkDq9kHx2T5GhPhGvs77Lj/2euGAEC/IbG7SQ0TMvVtKtQ+Dx+XOTY8kgZgIun32 Zw+Q== X-Received: by 10.224.147.194 with SMTP id m2mr6824814qav.52.1366210660343; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 07:57:40 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.49.28.41 with HTTP; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 07:57:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130417113015.GE13055@odin.tremily.us> References: <20130309121023.GE26574@odin.tremily.us> <20130416205942.GB13055@odin.tremily.us> <516DD074.3090906@gentoo.org> <20130416225317.GD13055@odin.tremily.us> <1366172280.5030.57.camel@big_daddy.dol-sen.ca> <20130417113015.GE13055@odin.tremily.us> From: Matt Turner Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 07:57:20 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-catalyst] [PATCH 0/2] Blacklisting binary packages To: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org Cc: Zac Medico Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Archives-Salt: ecfbccb9-e054-42f5-b9fa-a9fe47f3610c X-Archives-Hash: f01fa09bf423bfd81a5dafa7dab32da7 On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 4:30 AM, W. Trevor King wrote: > It would also have been nice if we'd > caught the s/;/:/ typo in 462348d during ML review, but I didn't. It would, yes, but it's expected that patches sent to the mailing list have actually been tested. Doing otherwise (and not stating so) is inexcusable. This has happened a number of times already.