From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-catalyst+bounces-2678-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66E161381F3
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 20:24:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0D2FFE0ACC;
	Thu, 11 Apr 2013 20:24:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86636E0ACC
	for <gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 20:24:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qc0-f170.google.com (mail-qc0-f170.google.com [209.85.216.170])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: mattst88)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9A44B33DD80
	for <gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 20:24:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qc0-f170.google.com with SMTP id d42so902075qca.1
        for <gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 13:24:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.224.40.129 with SMTP id k1mr8953056qae.22.1365711879091;
 Thu, 11 Apr 2013 13:24:39 -0700 (PDT)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-catalyst+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-catalyst+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-catalyst+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-catalyst.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.49.28.41 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 13:24:19 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <51670C69.1030801@gentoo.org>
References: <513A2F19.5040203@gentoo.org> <6472ad55830b40f838356a1b083b3815a4112358.1362768301.git.wking@tremily.us>
 <CAEdQ38Faa6cFBdg_FfQDZha+c-sKT13_iniDSyN2pSS0mLwJ3A@mail.gmail.com>
 <20130309121023.GE26574@odin.tremily.us> <20130411170941.GA14224@odin.tremily.us>
 <CAEdQ38G==bi34aAXWe-PPRkjyN64WKB5mvPo3y_KRQ1dB+xx+g@mail.gmail.com>
 <516706A3.6000500@gentoo.org> <CAEdQ38EUfwthOp4X_XmtPf3u_0RyPSnPREZ=E1c_W0o=cCTw9A@mail.gmail.com>
 <51670C69.1030801@gentoo.org>
From: Matt Turner <mattst88@gentoo.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 13:24:19 -0700
Message-ID: <CAEdQ38EXV3KVtVGd0m9zgye9cOMcWZCrbPzH-0CQhmHwZ14Z2g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-catalyst] Binary package dependencies and update_seed
To: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Archives-Salt: 85c92364-c72a-4e96-8a13-18db05c6e305
X-Archives-Hash: b1d0c2bdae06e5c6966f4da6dfe79bda

On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
<zerochaos@gentoo.org> wrote:
> We already don't BUILD any new packages during update_seed.  Originally
> we did, I encountered issues and fixed it in
> e7ea409acb52b43e9ea141c57201f9f87673f7ba to prevent building of packages
> during update_seed.

Right, I see.

So, to make sure that I'm on the same page: is the the problem that
we're using stale packages in stage1 and if so, where did they come
from? A previous stage1 build that didn't do update-seed?