From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D232198005 for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 02:42:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C4BADE0603; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 02:42:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51795E0603 for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 02:42:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ye0-f170.google.com (mail-ye0-f170.google.com [209.85.213.170]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mattst88) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2A20733DD7A for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 02:42:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ye0-f170.google.com with SMTP id m15so12494yen.15 for ; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 18:42:19 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.236.166.34 with SMTP id f22mr434528yhl.87.1361932939574; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 18:42:19 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.59.14 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 18:41:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1361932548.3997.320.camel@big_daddy.dol-sen.ca> References: <20130226180428.GA22651@odin.tremily.us> <1361928640.3997.283.camel@big_daddy.dol-sen.ca> <20130227014009.GC25035@odin.tremily.us> <1361932548.3997.320.camel@big_daddy.dol-sen.ca> From: Matt Turner Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 18:41:59 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-catalyst] patch, fix broken seed stage update To: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org Cc: zmedico@gentoo.org, fuzzyray@gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Archives-Salt: 6f1d8257-7dd1-47cf-b879-2aaa9e8719b2 X-Archives-Hash: cc59695bb97d872537999ae0c42b1f34 On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 6:35 PM, Brian Dolbec wrote: > On Tue, 2013-02-26 at 20:40 -0500, W. Trevor King wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 05:30:40PM -0800, Brian Dolbec wrote: >> > My aim for now is to debug the hell out of it, to stabilize all the >> > existing changes, BEFORE doing a ton more changes. That will also give >> > me more experience in how catalyst is used, possibly ideas how to change >> > it for the better. I'll fix the doc's generation and make a setup.py >> > and new 9999 ebuild. >> >> I'm not suggesting additional changes on top of yours, I'm suggesting >> new ones underneath yours, or alternatives to your current series. It >> seems a shame to spend time testing a work in progress, since you'll >> probably want to re-test the final form before merging. I'm trying to >> help polish your series down before we invest a lot of time testing. >> > > NNNNNNNNNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO :( not more rebasing I spent > several days just tracking down and fixing rebase errors. Fix a few, > that in turn caused more errors... Rebasing can be annoying, but isn't inherently difficult. Typically you don't rebase until you're ready for others to review and commit them. I'm curious if you know how to use interactive rebase to apply fix-ups to commits? If not, I'll be happy to walk you through it. It greatly simplifies the workflow.