From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57795198003 for ; Sat, 9 Mar 2013 02:30:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0A749E06B3; Sat, 9 Mar 2013 02:30:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C0B4E06B3 for ; Sat, 9 Mar 2013 02:30:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qa0-f50.google.com (mail-qa0-f50.google.com [209.85.216.50]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mattst88) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3A67333E0D4 for ; Sat, 9 Mar 2013 02:30:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qa0-f50.google.com with SMTP id dx4so132600qab.9 for ; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 18:30:27 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.224.209.193 with SMTP id gh1mr7011570qab.86.1362796227680; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 18:30:27 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.49.121.167 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Mar 2013 18:30:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20130301134614.GA8689@odin.tremily.us> References: <20130301134614.GA8689@odin.tremily.us> From: Matt Turner Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 18:30:07 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-catalyst] Stale AUTHORS? To: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org Cc: Sebastian Pipping Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Archives-Salt: 785a58c4-098f-4a4d-acbc-ef0ae9455a4d X-Archives-Hash: 8d3f8389032c57e0f4752721a5472f80 On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 5:46 AM, W. Trevor King wrote: > Sebastian Pipping and Matt Turner are listed as authors in > catalyst.1.txt, but not in AUTHORS. Perhaps AUTHORS is due for an > update? No real preference. The information is easy enough to look up in git history.