From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JMQbW-000264-Dn for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2008 16:25:02 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 487F4E00B9; Tue, 5 Feb 2008 16:24:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.248]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 240E0E00B9 for ; Tue, 5 Feb 2008 16:24:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c8so576571ana.47 for ; Tue, 05 Feb 2008 08:24:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=pfY8MELUz0cxVa0ucwSOWGC3PCrQatnLb36p8d8Gm5c=; b=ovBZcQz/MKz0hEGK9b4WlPOs4z3dgYz/9klLnkwYdf28Rg+cbyjieST6kFjmQKsN2mUqC3ZE19B22iz8oPTOFV7CpZ97D7gVp42v+fd+mD2fOmTcaySwa+Z1A0K4lGorvn3bwIr1qLapxC5RhaBfNNPlvy8qzS0rE60T2R3Q5SY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=qgS1FX0He8012wP9EDWm7w0xR1quZpH8r/AX26NQB5MuIUWDjBSjQwCrLgVmvW4TfqDZJgj82jvkSRr0Iubw4ZWmYpET5b46E+ulevJPulqpJzh6+pF1K7vK77uSfHJBDZo38Df5m8J7O/Cw2urMi5LCz8gJEYb1GUxmTLJIFo8= Received: by 10.100.44.4 with SMTP id r4mr1179686anr.0.1202228696844; Tue, 05 Feb 2008 08:24:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.214.17 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Feb 2008 08:24:56 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <3f456b460802050824y3288a5c4y5c2b3173eb5acdbd@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 08:24:56 -0800 From: "Derek Fedel" To: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-catalyst] setarch blocked by util-linux In-Reply-To: <47A88BE0.4090507@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <3f456b460802050809o65531925v21c8dec07b12dee3@mail.gmail.com> <47A88BE0.4090507@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: aa9613ec-eeb5-4770-a697-c2fe833fcd9e X-Archives-Hash: eb0503124a900293856513f9b3ffa537 Ah, silly me. I should've figured it was something along those lines, but I had read mention of catalyst not forcing setarch anymore in the ChangeLog and got confused, I guess. Thanks, and sorry for the now seemingly inane question. On Feb 5, 2008 8:16 AM, Andrew Gaffney wrote: > Derek Fedel wrote: > > I know! I know! 2.0.5 isn't supposed to have this problem. Let me > > explain, I've got a brand new install of 2007.0, a fresh copy of > > portage, and this as my spec file: > > How many times do we have to say this? :P > > If you're going to build your own CD, you also need to build your own set of > stages with the same snapshot. This is the *only* way to completely avoid the > various upgrade blockers that occur in the tree. > > -- > Andrew Gaffney http://dev.gentoo.org/~agaffney/ > Gentoo Linux Developer Catalyst/Installer + x86 release coordinator > -- > gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org mailing list > > -- gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org mailing list