* [gentoo-catalyst] setarch blocked by util-linux
@ 2008-02-05 16:09 Derek Fedel
2008-02-05 16:16 ` Andrew Gaffney
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Derek Fedel @ 2008-02-05 16:09 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-catalyst
I know! I know! 2.0.5 isn't supposed to have this problem. Let me
explain, I've got a brand new install of 2007.0, a fresh copy of
portage, and this as my spec file:
subarch: amd64
version_stamp: 2008.taco
target: livecd-stage1
rel_type: default
profile: default-linux/amd64/2007.0
snapshot: snapshot
source_subpath: stage3-amd64-2007.0
livecd/use:
-X
-gtk
-gtk2
-kde
-arts
-alsa
-avi
-cdr
-cups
-esd
gphoto2
acpi
-dvd
-dvdr
-emacs
-ethereal
f77
-fbcon
-ginac
-odbc
-plotutils
-ppds
-samba
-sse
usb
-wmf
-xml
-xosd
-gnome
-opengl
-oss
-sdl
-spell
-truetype
livecd/packages:
baselayout
module-init-tools
hotplug
syslog-ng
pciutils
strace
nfs-utils
usbutils
e2fsprogs
reiserfsprogs
nano
less
openssh
dhcpcd
mingetty
screen
iputils
tcptraceroute
ethtool
libusb
grub
gentoolkit
But when I run catalyst -a -v -f testmini.spec (said specfile from
above), catalyst crashes out and gives me:
[blocks B ] sys-apps/setarch (is blocking sys-apps/util-linux-2.13-r2)
Total: 38 packages (11 upgrades, 27 new, 1 block), Size of downloads: 15,885 kB
!!! Error: The above package list contains packages which cannot be installed
!!! at the same time on the same system.
For more information about Blocked Packages, please refer to the following
section of the Gentoo Linux x86 Handbook (architecture is irrelevant):
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?full=1#blocked
!!! catalyst: Error in attempt to build packages
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "modules/generic_stage_target.py", line 1200, in build_packages
" build_packages "+mypack,"Error in attempt to build packages",env=self.env)
File "/usr/lib/catalyst/modules/catalyst_support.py", line 486, in cmd
raise CatalystError,myexc
CatalystError: <unprintable instance object>
None
!!! catalyst: livecdbuild aborting due to error.
!!! catalyst: Error encountered during run of target livecd-stage1
Catalyst aborting....
lockfile does not exist
'/var/tmp/catalyst/tmp/default/livecd-stage1-amd64-2008.taco/.catalyst_lock'
I've read in numerous places how to fix this if its breaking portage
on a live system, they say to just unmerge setarch, so I went ahead
and did that, but it still hates me.
Does anyone have any tips? Any help would be most appreciated!
Thanks!
--
gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-catalyst] setarch blocked by util-linux
2008-02-05 16:09 [gentoo-catalyst] setarch blocked by util-linux Derek Fedel
@ 2008-02-05 16:16 ` Andrew Gaffney
2008-02-05 16:24 ` Derek Fedel
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Gaffney @ 2008-02-05 16:16 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-catalyst
Derek Fedel wrote:
> I know! I know! 2.0.5 isn't supposed to have this problem. Let me
> explain, I've got a brand new install of 2007.0, a fresh copy of
> portage, and this as my spec file:
How many times do we have to say this? :P
If you're going to build your own CD, you also need to build your own set of
stages with the same snapshot. This is the *only* way to completely avoid the
various upgrade blockers that occur in the tree.
--
Andrew Gaffney http://dev.gentoo.org/~agaffney/
Gentoo Linux Developer Catalyst/Installer + x86 release coordinator
--
gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-catalyst] setarch blocked by util-linux
2008-02-05 16:16 ` Andrew Gaffney
@ 2008-02-05 16:24 ` Derek Fedel
2008-02-05 16:47 ` Mike Frysinger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Derek Fedel @ 2008-02-05 16:24 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-catalyst
Ah, silly me. I should've figured it was something along those lines,
but I had read mention of catalyst not forcing setarch anymore in the
ChangeLog and got confused, I guess. Thanks, and sorry for the now
seemingly inane question.
On Feb 5, 2008 8:16 AM, Andrew Gaffney <agaffney@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Derek Fedel wrote:
> > I know! I know! 2.0.5 isn't supposed to have this problem. Let me
> > explain, I've got a brand new install of 2007.0, a fresh copy of
> > portage, and this as my spec file:
>
> How many times do we have to say this? :P
>
> If you're going to build your own CD, you also need to build your own set of
> stages with the same snapshot. This is the *only* way to completely avoid the
> various upgrade blockers that occur in the tree.
>
> --
> Andrew Gaffney http://dev.gentoo.org/~agaffney/
> Gentoo Linux Developer Catalyst/Installer + x86 release coordinator
> --
> gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
>
>
--
gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-catalyst] setarch blocked by util-linux
2008-02-05 16:24 ` Derek Fedel
@ 2008-02-05 16:47 ` Mike Frysinger
2008-02-05 16:55 ` Andrew Gaffney
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Mike Frysinger @ 2008-02-05 16:47 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-catalyst; +Cc: Derek Fedel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 960 bytes --]
On Tuesday 05 February 2008, Derek Fedel wrote:
> Ah, silly me. I should've figured it was something along those lines,
> but I had read mention of catalyst not forcing setarch anymore in the
> ChangeLog and got confused, I guess. Thanks, and sorry for the now
> seemingly inane question.
please fix your quoting ... top posting is the devil
> On Feb 5, 2008 8:16 AM, Andrew Gaffney <agaffney@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > Derek Fedel wrote:
> > > I know! I know! 2.0.5 isn't supposed to have this problem. Let me
> > > explain, I've got a brand new install of 2007.0, a fresh copy of
> > > portage, and this as my spec file:
> >
> > How many times do we have to say this? :P
> >
> > If you're going to build your own CD, you also need to build your own set
> > of stages with the same snapshot. This is the *only* way to completely
> > avoid the various upgrade blockers that occur in the tree.
is there a catalyst/stages FAQ ? if not, there should be ...
-mike
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 827 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-catalyst] setarch blocked by util-linux
2008-02-05 16:47 ` Mike Frysinger
@ 2008-02-05 16:55 ` Andrew Gaffney
2008-02-05 19:26 ` Mike Frysinger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Gaffney @ 2008-02-05 16:55 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-catalyst
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday 05 February 2008, Derek Fedel wrote:
>> Ah, silly me. I should've figured it was something along those lines,
>> but I had read mention of catalyst not forcing setarch anymore in the
>> ChangeLog and got confused, I guess. Thanks, and sorry for the now
>> seemingly inane question.
>
> please fix your quoting ... top posting is the devil
I concur :P
>> On Feb 5, 2008 8:16 AM, Andrew Gaffney <agaffney@gentoo.org> wrote:
>>> Derek Fedel wrote:
>>>> I know! I know! 2.0.5 isn't supposed to have this problem. Let me
>>>> explain, I've got a brand new install of 2007.0, a fresh copy of
>>>> portage, and this as my spec file:
>>> How many times do we have to say this? :P
>>>
>>> If you're going to build your own CD, you also need to build your own set
>>> of stages with the same snapshot. This is the *only* way to completely
>>> avoid the various upgrade blockers that occur in the tree.
>
> is there a catalyst/stages FAQ ? if not, there should be ...
Are you volunteering? :)
--
Andrew Gaffney http://dev.gentoo.org/~agaffney/
Gentoo Linux Developer Catalyst/Installer + x86 release coordinator
--
gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-catalyst] setarch blocked by util-linux
2008-02-05 16:55 ` Andrew Gaffney
@ 2008-02-05 19:26 ` Mike Frysinger
2008-02-07 21:38 ` Chris Gianelloni
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Mike Frysinger @ 2008-02-05 19:26 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-catalyst; +Cc: Andrew Gaffney
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 953 bytes --]
On Tuesday 05 February 2008, Andrew Gaffney wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Tuesday 05 February 2008, Derek Fedel wrote:
> >> On Feb 5, 2008 8:16 AM, Andrew Gaffney <agaffney@gentoo.org> wrote:
> >>> Derek Fedel wrote:
> >>>> I know! I know! 2.0.5 isn't supposed to have this problem. Let me
> >>>> explain, I've got a brand new install of 2007.0, a fresh copy of
> >>>> portage, and this as my spec file:
> >>>
> >>> How many times do we have to say this? :P
> >>>
> >>> If you're going to build your own CD, you also need to build your own
> >>> set of stages with the same snapshot. This is the *only* way to
> >>> completely avoid the various upgrade blockers that occur in the tree.
> >
> > is there a catalyst/stages FAQ ? if not, there should be ...
>
> Are you volunteering? :)
give me a list of questions/answers and i can do the XML. i dont watch this
list/irc channel though so i dont know what the FAQs
-mike
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 827 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-02-07 21:38 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-02-05 16:09 [gentoo-catalyst] setarch blocked by util-linux Derek Fedel
2008-02-05 16:16 ` Andrew Gaffney
2008-02-05 16:24 ` Derek Fedel
2008-02-05 16:47 ` Mike Frysinger
2008-02-05 16:55 ` Andrew Gaffney
2008-02-05 19:26 ` Mike Frysinger
2008-02-07 21:38 ` Chris Gianelloni
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox