From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QZUlS-00050Q-1m for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 21:15:10 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BEF2B1C0DF; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 21:14:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from foo.stuge.se (foo.stuge.se [212.181.44.140]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 66FFF1C0DF for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 21:14:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 9654 invoked by uid 501); 22 Jun 2011 21:14:49 -0000 Message-ID: <20110622211449.9653.qmail@stuge.se> Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 23:14:49 +0200 From: Peter Stuge To: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-catalyst] Undocumented subarches, e.g. core2 Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org References: <4E02589E.9090006@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E02589E.9090006@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 3051edfe2b6696c811e86f02ec483b78 Sebastian Pipping wrote: > It looks like there are subarches supported by catalyst 2.0.6.916 that > are not documented on > > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/releng/catalyst/ > > Would you mind if I add any findings to that page? I say go for it while you are looking at stuff in this area. There's very little activity on the list. :) //Peter