From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MyU9a-0002Qr-Ca for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 17:30:18 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EAA99E081B; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 17:30:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD6A4E081B for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 17:30:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1414EB52D1 for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 17:30:16 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-catalyst] Too many problems with groupadd when creating stage3 Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:30:14 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.1 (Linux/2.6.31; KDE/4.3.1; x86_64; ; ) References: <200910151242.21514.vapier@gentoo.org> <20091015164850.14099.qmail@stuge.se> In-Reply-To: <20091015164850.14099.qmail@stuge.se> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2445965.WUpbrvHMr5"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200910151330.14644.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 5a0e3f7a-05a5-415a-a840-f2d3758de9a8 X-Archives-Hash: 97bf4c87e05eee1b32ad44c184ce5c67 --nextPart2445965.WUpbrvHMr5 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thursday 15 October 2009 12:48:50 Peter Stuge wrote: > Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > > I'm having problems again with groupadd, > > > > > > Maybe it's a problem with eutils.eclass? If it's inherited then it's > > > fair to expect that all it's functions will work. How to solve this > > > for user database changes that want to call programs in shadow? > > > > there is no problem with eutils.eclass >=20 > Because it is not intended to function for stage2? Or because it is > intended to assume that groupadd and friends are available? the release building tools have to make shadow available earlier for Linux= =20 targets > But where is the problem? One idea is to provide another > implementation of these commands than the one in shadow. If that's > a good idea, then where should that implementation go? this is a bad idea =2Dmike --nextPart2445965.WUpbrvHMr5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJK11wmAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBuBMP/Rst1+EDCXOtUlz0/gcYqRRX a//buAketVNnb1/4UbEq4SPePtdJbzFYGEFrH9oF07RuPUeV1zBQEoFCLIh0IiSj wKO4HlCa3NIYNIvY/zPZAbpqMpnDcmv6CB7wzp3l42OpBf9nUJSINJ74v7Lynyc8 xt4rpWoKBQXmXXlbDA/EjtwRS+wX0p55xoIFyjHI7yn+9Z3gHrWs/CpjUTbcEFS/ aI8oN5sJ7eD11DlP3K2+xDajObgGPUaYRwD9hxGLcHXV9lrjuQmps6TDbmrhq6h5 mFGUUsAqJGpaZerypa7Smt3o75WphLgCV1jaVvmIZu8RdFIgC5i/QznceRnVPS3J seyX3+6SQbGSKhLtQLUH8+rGWVaxfwR94SQe0c8Fu9HO25i4YCEHrQ21ARNPQhXy 336BFcpujNo6bqljZ3LVvPttcu/wXJ9wK2I+UETZ9P8r8ROUstWYLlCRgX709UOI /30H9HES93vhzREt8iP6Yha+grGoXnIi1Ona8bAbJmcvPpq8L5qnryHKbvQYTBEu L5hK9MUS0kSlZI76sRtoPmT3dEqk0cbRJdQzr0W+QcZU0eQv2229eRy8Bycx3DS5 CSYegCgoYFlCF4sF46qnfDdaza0zdo4WFEwwHXB9QIzjvZkWmgKSmrdwfd1lyYVk S4f68uBeIJvbmVmr2TeR =zY/i -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2445965.WUpbrvHMr5--