From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HxUvS-0007If-IV for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 21:26:19 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l5ALPnKD024578; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 21:25:49 GMT Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com (mu-out-0910.google.com [209.85.134.188]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l5ALPnhE024572 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 21:25:49 GMT Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id i10so810913mue for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 14:25:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=pOUk5rJ5yqh7Pw54G3w/6iQWT4dctnk0of+SsgD2Jb2Sy66tHC8bQmoVaWlnM2Y7CKXrbYgVd1+0EVdnzxfLKocly2gxOwMznrRA/DGGwJ0mFciugr45u2iRBEyPgwAeXlq6YzSXKaPgdjrxGq7/FrlEVVmP40DpiNToH2IG8z8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ZU5+CeNH4rDV5OPdN/t/8Rwgu/x7Y9xQogHV4ExBi5wGk1EwAVjmTQOYiKvt5YsXhJuNC+SPAerYftGbffMUFagxdUt0PyVfhQOqq0QuGTjqU+HF/qvtQtS9bKLn1jHiRA/moS9SQfwfAoSsjNw8hjRl+x51SiO0CC119k65FoE= Received: by 10.82.126.5 with SMTP id y5mr9730076buc.1181510748538; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 14:25:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Bazaar ( [86.71.195.6]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h7sm13586611nfh.2007.06.10.14.25.46 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 10 Jun 2007 14:25:46 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 20:51:11 +0200 From: Isidore Ducasse To: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-catalyst] unionfs and genkernel Message-ID: <20070610205111.2902a9ef@Bazaar> In-Reply-To: <46656D14.7030306@gentoo.org> References: <3BBC4EF5-98E4-4EBE-8597-F8DC52EB0809@gmail.com> <46601250.4030603@gentoo.org> <20070601175240.4c5e244c@Bazaar> <46656D14.7030306@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.1 (GTK+ 2.10.9; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-catalyst@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: e8589826-ea2f-455d-8a77-7759ab7c9ca7 X-Archives-Hash: 81c3495ad02fb1236a93e95390002574 le Tue, 05 Jun 2007 09:03:00 -0500 Andrew Gaffney a =E9crit: > Luca Casagrande wrote: > >=20 > > Il giorno 01/giu/07, alle ore 17:52, Isidore Ducasse ha scritto: > >=20 > >>> > >>> We used genkernel-3.4.8 and gentoo-sources-2.6.19-r5 for the release. > >> > >> As far as I know, unionfs doesn't work for >2.6.20 kernels. At least=20 > >> not portage's ones. > >> aufs on the sunrise overlay seems a very interesting alternative. Does= =20 > >> someone know if there are plans to integrate it into standard portage= =20 > >> tree? > >> > >=20 > > Have you tested it with 2.6.19-r5 ? >=20 > It was apparently working with early builds of the 2007.0 release using t= hat=20 > kernel, but "something" happened, and it no longer works in the official = release=20 > media. We haven't investigated it yet, since it wasn't an advertised feat= ure. >=20 > --=20 Is there any chance gentoo-livecd will ever use an alternative union-filesy= stem as aufs? It does compile and work fine with later kernels (I use it wi= th a 2.6.20-gentoo-r8 kernel under amd64). -- gentoo-catalyst@gentoo.org mailing list