From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Qa0Vh-0006c6-5O for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 07:09:01 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 428D21C00E; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 07:08:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F24191C00E for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 07:08:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.6] (ppp85-141-143-227.pppoe.mtu-net.ru [85.141.143.227]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pva) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 842F21BC007 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 07:08:17 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-catalyst] Migrating man page to asciidoc? From: Peter Volkov To: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <4E03DD4C.7050005@gentoo.org> References: <4E03DD4C.7050005@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 11:07:54 +0400 Message-ID: <1308899274.624.67.camel@tablet> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 65f2fce710454e481973d0e2c6cc5265 =D0=92 =D0=9F=D1=82=D0=BD, 24/06/2011 =D0=B2 02:41 +0200, Sebastian Pippi= ng =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: > According to git blame, the man page of catalyst hasn't been touched > since 2005. I would like to migrate it to Asciidoc to ease up future > maintenance. I would add a Makefile including a "dist" target to make > sure we always ship releases with an updated man page. The list of > supported subarches could be pulled into the man page automatically. >=20 > What do you say? For me if man page was not touched since 2005 means that it's completely unmaintained and thus since you are interested in maintaining - just go ahead! BTW, thanks for your efforts. -- Peter.