From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.105.134.102] (helo=robin.gentoo.org)
by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
id 1Dl5uz-00037h-VK
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 14:09:30 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j5ME8bqe025913;
Wed, 22 Jun 2005 14:08:37 GMT
Received: from smtp03.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (smtp.nuvox.net [64.89.70.9])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j5ME8ajD007541
for <gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 14:08:37 GMT
Received: from cgianelloni.nuvox.net (216.215.202.4.nw.nuvox.net [216.215.202.4])
by smtp03.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id j5ME9PTl025464
for <gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 10:09:25 -0400
Received: by cgianelloni.nuvox.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 22 Jun 2005 10:09:06 -0400
Subject: Re: [gentoo-catalyst] DEPEND/RDEPEND vs. binary packages
From: Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org
In-Reply-To: <vpdrzmtipkje.fsf@lemming.engeast.baynetworks.com>
References: <17080.49269.273557.62397@lemming.engeast.baynetworks.com>
<1119447256.13606.52.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net>
<vpdrzmtipkje.fsf@lemming.engeast.baynetworks.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-aOHNFhcvzjncYLAmHt+t"
Organization: Gentoo Linux
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 10:09:06 -0400
Message-Id: <1119449346.13606.55.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-catalyst+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-catalyst+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-catalyst+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-catalyst.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-catalyst@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.2
X-Archives-Salt: 80f59de3-1293-42b3-bac8-36e44bc44039
X-Archives-Hash: c819b345d57012d6a790a790942344c8
--=-aOHNFhcvzjncYLAmHt+t
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 09:51 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> %% Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@gentoo.org> writes:
>=20
> >> As two examples: one package does an "inherit webapp", and then in
> >> livecd-stage1, the webapp.eclass webapp_pkg_setup() function tries t=
o
> >> source ${ETC_CONFIG}, which is /etc/vhosts/webapp-config. But, of
> >> course, the webapp-config package is not installed when installing
> >> binary packages, because webapp.eclass only adds it to the DEPEND li=
st.
>=20
> cg> This is a bug in the package. It requires webapp-config to be in *=
both*
> cg> DEPEND and RDEPEND.
>=20
> But, then, isn't this really a bug in the webapp.eclass? The DEPEND is
> updated there so shouldn't the RDEPEND be updated there as well?
Probably. I didn't actually look at the eclass/package. I was just
making a general observation.
> I don't know where to file eclass bugs, though...?
Same place as ebuild bugs, http://bugs.gentoo.org
If you don't know where to assign it, don't worry about it and let
bug-wranglers take care of it. I can tell you that it'll be the webapp
herd, though.
--=20
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead/QA Manager
Games - Developer
Gentoo Linux
--=-aOHNFhcvzjncYLAmHt+t
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBCuXECkT4lNIS36YERAic9AJ9kQAvTdpddgVEeaJ3lGGx6SwypOgCeL2y7
drfnY+4Qr59MkKHpnC964ZI=
=N1xQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-aOHNFhcvzjncYLAmHt+t--
--
gentoo-catalyst@gentoo.org mailing list