From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1PnPc8-0002yT-Qs for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 06:02:49 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D0F28E0A9D for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 06:02:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0EEEE09DA for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 05:52:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PnPSY-00021G-Qk for gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 06:52:54 +0100 Received: from ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.231.22.224]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 06:52:54 +0100 Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 06:52:54 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Major update problem Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 05:52:43 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <201102071227.16730.gentoo@appjaws.plus.com> <201102071327.06792.gentoo@appjaws.plus.com> <4D51B5BF.4040109@gentoo.org> <877hd9vj3d.fsf@phoenix.asynchronous.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net User-Agent: Pan/0.133 (House of Butterflies; GIT 25ed40d branch-testing) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 8e23c3e12b6ed33bb772fb11183dc7ab Josh Sled posted on Wed, 09 Feb 2011 01:05:10 -0500 as excerpted: > Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> writes: >> Jonathan Callen posted on Tue, 08 Feb 2011 16:29:35 -0500 as excerpted= : >> >>> Portage 2.1 only has support for 3 sets: @world, @system, and >>> @selected. All of the other support for sets has been disabled >>> internally in the code but is otherwise present to allow easier >>> merging between the 2.1 and master branches in git. >> >> Thanks. I was wondering how I'd missed that big news! >=20 > Well, it's still only in unstable. :) I'd hope before this goes into > stable, a News item (at least!) is created to guide users into how thei= r > behavior needs to change. So then sets (beyond the three above) are unmasked to ~arch, at least,=20 then? Because last I knew they were in the (last I knew) hard-masked 2.2= =20 series, only. So even unmasking them to ~arch would be big news, here. =20 (And, since I run ~arch, if they're ~arch keyworded and not in=20 package.mask, they're not masked, from my viewpoint. They might be ~arch= ,=20 but that's not masked, but ~arch. Masked means either an entry in=20 package.mask or KEYWORDS=3D"", to me.) --=20 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman