public inbox for gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-amd64]  Re: New install, /var on tmpfs
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 20:32:46 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <pan.2008.02.06.20.32.45@cox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 200802061341.37169.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de

Volker Armin Hemmann <volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> posted
200802061341.37169.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de, excerpted below,
on  Wed, 06 Feb 2008 13:41:37 +0100:

> and the more spindles, the higher the chance for a fatal disk crash.

Well yes, but that's sort of the point of using RAID-6 instead of RAID-5, 
and once one gets over 8-10 disks, RAID-10 or RAID-61 (? or would it be 
called 16, duplicating each disk, not the entire RAID-6 ?) becomes 
practical.

Actually, today I'd probably implement it using a couple of those 
external 5-way port-multipliered SATA boxes, connecting each to the 
system via single SATA-300 cable, which should handle 5 disk's disk-rate 
I/O reasonably well without bottlenecking.  Connect each cable to a 
separate SATA-300 card on separate PCI-E or PCI-X channels, avoiding 
bottlenecking there, and the bandwidth should be reasonable.  Because the 
external disk arrays have their own power supplies, the one in the 
computer itself wouldn't have to be such a honker, I could run low noise 
supplies in all of them, and the computer case could be smaller too, as 
the only drive in it would be a DVD burner.  It'd be three smaller, 
quieter, more portable and easier to work with boxes, in place of the 
single full tower case, quad internal hard drives plus DVD burner, I'm 
using today.  The dual 5-way drive cases would give me space for ten 
drives, of which I'd probably make two hot-spares, leaving an 8-way 
RAID-6, two parity, six data stripes.  Large write performance, the real 
killer now, would be much better, and because I'd have two hot-spares 
ready for the system to bring online if necessary, total reliability 
should remain comparable to now, 4-way RAID-6 but without the hot-spares.

-- 
Duncan - List replies preferred.   No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master."  Richard Stallman

-- 
gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org mailing list



      reply	other threads:[~2008-02-06 20:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-02-06  6:19 [gentoo-amd64] New install, /var on tmpfs Tonko Mulder
2008-02-06  7:39 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2008-02-06  7:47   ` Tonko Mulder
2008-02-06 10:19     ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2008-02-06 11:53       ` Tonko Mulder
2008-02-06 12:22         ` Duncan
2008-02-06 12:41           ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2008-02-06 20:32             ` Duncan [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=pan.2008.02.06.20.32.45@cox.net \
    --to=1i5t5.duncan@cox.net \
    --cc=gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox