From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HSiem-0000o9-5J for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 17 Mar 2007 23:49:52 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l2HNmD0K017117; Sat, 17 Mar 2007 23:48:13 GMT Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l2HNmCpN017112 for ; Sat, 17 Mar 2007 23:48:13 GMT Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HSid8-0003so-Ty for gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 18 Mar 2007 00:48:10 +0100 Received: from ip68-231-13-122.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.231.13.122]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 18 Mar 2007 00:48:10 +0100 Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-231-13-122.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 18 Mar 2007 00:48:10 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Anyone tried xorg-server-1.2.99.901? Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2007 23:47:58 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <7a329d910703100823o1f5d91c5n9378510dfddbf027@mail.gmail.com> <200703171611.01844.prh@gotadsl.co.uk> <1174159371.6186.10.camel@ShadowBook.Workgroup> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip68-231-13-122.ph.ph.cox.net User-Agent: Pan/0.125 (Potzrebie) Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: a0617a33-4f31-449b-8810-d2dce447df1c X-Archives-Hash: 4ffacd8eb2ea6d59e5283126cb1846a2 "B. Nice" posted 1174159371.6186.10.camel@ShadowBook.Workgroup, excerpted below, on Sat, 17 Mar 2007 15:22:51 -0400: > Who's right. Who cares. IMNSHO it is extremely ignorant and arrogant to > assume that one philosophy is superior to the other. Hopefully with the > major and minor Desktop Environments competing, everyone can be > satisfied. Agreed. GNOME drives me to distraction, but apparently some folks like it. Variety is what FLOSS is good at, so let's celebrate the differences, and be glad there remains the choice. =8^) Another way to look at it is that all the devs that like the dumbed down interface will be attracted to GNOME, leaving KDE in less danger of having them come in and try to dumb it down too. Of course the reverse is true as well, the folks that like to have everything customizable will be attracted to KDE, leaving the GNOME folks in relative peace to do it their way. As long as the GNOME folks stay there and don't try to dumb down KDE, I'm happy, and I'm sure many GNOME users say the same about KDE devs and "needless complexity". -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list