public inbox for gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-amd64]  Re: Anyone tried xorg-server-1.2.99.901?
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2007 23:47:58 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <pan.2007.03.17.23.47.58@cox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1174159371.6186.10.camel@ShadowBook.Workgroup

"B. Nice" <anonymous.pseudonym.88@gmail.com> posted
1174159371.6186.10.camel@ShadowBook.Workgroup, excerpted below, on  Sat,
17 Mar 2007 15:22:51 -0400:

> Who's right.  Who cares. IMNSHO it is extremely ignorant and arrogant to
> assume that one philosophy is superior to the other.  Hopefully with the
> major and minor Desktop Environments competing, everyone can be
> satisfied.

Agreed.  GNOME drives me to distraction, but apparently some folks like 
it.  Variety is what FLOSS is good at, so let's celebrate the 
differences, and be glad there remains the choice. =8^)

Another way to look at it is that all the devs that like the dumbed down 
interface will be attracted to GNOME, leaving KDE in less danger of 
having them come in and try to dumb it down too.  Of course the reverse 
is true as well, the folks that like to have everything customizable will 
be attracted to KDE, leaving the GNOME folks in relative peace to do it 
their way.  As long as the GNOME folks stay there and don't try to dumb 
down KDE, I'm happy, and I'm sure many GNOME users say the same about KDE 
devs and "needless complexity".

-- 
Duncan - List replies preferred.   No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master."  Richard Stallman

-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list



  reply	other threads:[~2007-03-17 23:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-03-10 16:23 [gentoo-amd64] Anyone tried xorg-server-1.2.99.901? Wil Reichert
2007-03-17 11:35 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2007-03-17 14:14   ` Wil Reichert
2007-03-17 19:13     ` B. Nice
2007-03-17 16:11   ` Peter Humphrey
2007-03-17 19:22     ` B. Nice
2007-03-17 23:47       ` Duncan [this message]
2007-03-18 15:17       ` The Doctor

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=pan.2007.03.17.23.47.58@cox.net \
    --to=1i5t5.duncan@cox.net \
    --cc=gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox