From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FEFRp-0004MN-FK for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2006 00:44:09 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k210ec1L008631; Wed, 1 Mar 2006 00:40:38 GMT Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k210ebMt025721 for ; Wed, 1 Mar 2006 00:40:37 GMT Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1FEFOp-0006gf-Ig for gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2006 01:41:03 +0100 Received: from ip68-230-97-182.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.230.97.182]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 01 Mar 2006 01:41:03 +0100 Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-230-97-182.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 01 Mar 2006 01:41:03 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Re: xinerama in xorg-x11-7.0-r1? Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 17:40:38 -0700 Organization: Organization? Me? Message-ID: References: <200602272332.12370.prh@gotadsl.co.uk> <200602280915.09978.prh@gotadsl.co.uk> <7573e9640602280940q7d9a3c4fmc8c0a06777026076@mail.gmail.com> <7573e9640602281239s20eb1796sb6ad626f76f68e31@mail.gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip68-230-97-182.ph.ph.cox.net User-Agent: Pan/0.14.2.91 (As She Crawled Across the Table) Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: 281b6ab7-d0e5-4f4d-828d-1619a25114f2 X-Archives-Hash: 7719c7f417c0f62172383b117b100403 Richard Fish posted <7573e9640602281239s20eb1796sb6ad626f76f68e31@mail.gmail.com>, excerpted below, on Tue, 28 Feb 2006 13:39:11 -0700: > On 2/28/06, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> wrote: >> Indeed, it seems to be. I don't see the flag there any more, altho I >> could swear it used to be. > > You are not wrong here! From the changelog: > > 02 Nov 2005; Donnie Berkholz ; > xorg-x11-7.0.0_rc1.ebuild: > Remove xinerama USE flag and make it mandatory. A large number of > applications have mandatory xinerama, so having the library optional makes > things unnecessarily complex. Thanks! That makes me feel better! =8^) Such a string of bad luck, I was beginning to wonder if this is how Alzheimer's or mad cow disease starts or something, especially when I could have sworn the flag was there! I must have figured things out and merged it right about time they removed the flag. -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman in http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list