From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1ESFng-0005v1-Tt
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 15:24:21 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id j9JFKeXo006996;
	Wed, 19 Oct 2005 15:20:40 GMT
Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id j9JFKbI4028511
	for <gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 15:20:37 GMT
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43)
	id 1ESFj5-0004mi-P9
	for gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 17:19:35 +0200
Received: from ip68-230-97-182.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.230.97.182])
        by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 17:19:35 +0200
Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-230-97-182.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 17:19:35 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
Subject: [gentoo-amd64]  Re: Problems with complieing with amd64
Date:  Wed, 19 Oct 2005 08:13:48 -0700
Organization:  Sometimes
Message-ID:  <pan.2005.10.19.15.13.47.603244@cox.net>
References:  <43565060.5040604@nnc3.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-amd64+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-amd64+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-amd64+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-amd64.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version:  1.0
Content-Type:  text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding:  8bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip68-230-97-182.ph.ph.cox.net
User-Agent: Pan/0.14.2.91 (As She Crawled Across the Table)
Sender: news <news@sea.gmane.org>
X-Archives-Salt: 774e03ca-e53c-4f0e-80f8-2566d60279cb
X-Archives-Hash: a0dc1c7ca363b5954f164d8cca47da09

Nestor Camacho III posted <43565060.5040604@nnc3.com>, excerpted below, 
on Wed, 19 Oct 2005 09:55:44 -0400:

> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
> <html>
> <head>
>   <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
>   <title></title>
> </head>
> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
> I have one of those Sun Java workstations, and figured I would put
> gentoo on it. While I was installing it I would sometimes get the
> following symptoms. <br>

Unfortunately, I don't have an answer to your question, but... in the
future could you please refrain from posting HTML to the list?  It's
common in the Linux and open source community to consider HTML mail the
playground of spammers and crackers, and as such, many either filter it
entirely, or at minimum use clients that don't parse it, for security
reasons.  Thus, HTML posts come out looking like crap, if they are seen at
all, and folks that might otherwise have your answer never reply, either 
because they didn't see the post in the first place, or because they
simply don't reply to those that post HTML.

On the Gentoo lists/groups, people aren't as strict and you'll often get a
reply, but it's still a good idea to turn off HTML once you are made aware
of the fact you are posting with it.  After all, is your post /really/ so
lacking in content that  it /must/ be dressed up all fancy in HTML to make
it interesting enough to read?  If not, why waste the bandwidth and risk
offense, unnecessarily?

-- 
Duncan - List replies preferred.   No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master."  Richard Stallman in
http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html


-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list