public inbox for gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-amd64]  DualCore Was: [OT] test, please ignore.
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 05:08:51 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <pan.2005.10.17.12.08.50.439914@cox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20051016185208.GC7641@lakedaemon.net

Jason Cooper posted <20051016185208.GC7641@lakedaemon.net>, excerpted
below,  on Sun, 16 Oct 2005 14:52:08 -0400:

> Now there you go.  FFI.  Failure to Follow Instructions. :)
> 
> Looking at buying a new MB and processor so thought I'd listen in on
> amd64 and (possibly) dual-core issues under gentoo.  Yes, am reading the
> docs also. :)

AMD64s do dual-core really well.  I'm not running dual-core yet, but I'm
running dual 242 Opterons, and the CPU/CPU teaming is better on AMD64, due
to the HyperTransport Interconnect, than with typical x86s.  Dual-core
only increases the cooperative effect.

(FWIW, I'm running a Tyan s2885 dual socket 940, dual-core capable tho
it's now an older board, AGP and PCI-X, not PCI-Express.  It's got four
slots for memory associated with each CPU/MMU, with the BIOS able to
handle 2G sticks, so a max 16 GB memory.  I've been very happy with it
since I figured out my gig of PC3200 generic memory wasn't quite good to
the rated clock, and declocked it slightly (3000) in the BIOS.  I expect
I'll stick with the same board, after all it's a $400 board, upgrading
memory to at least 8 gig, and possibly upgrading to dual-core CPUs giving
me a quad-core system, thru another couple years at least.)

A dual-CPU Opteron system has met all my expectations and then some.  I'm
/very/ satisfied.  So... regardless of whether you go single dual-core or
dual dual-core, it's a decision I don't believe you'll regret -- as long
as you aren't a gamer expecting double the performance from today's
single-threaded games.  If that's your thing, top-of-the-line single-core
is better for your money.  Multitasking, however... Running emerges
without interrupting or slowing your desktop... dual amd64, whether core
or cpu, does GREAT at that!

-- 
Duncan - List replies preferred.   No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master."  Richard Stallman in
http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html


-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list



      reply	other threads:[~2005-10-17 12:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-10-16 18:52 [gentoo-amd64] [OT] test, please ignore Jason Cooper
2005-10-17 12:08 ` Duncan [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=pan.2005.10.17.12.08.50.439914@cox.net \
    --to=1i5t5.duncan@cox.net \
    --cc=gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox