From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-amd64] DualCore Was: [OT] test, please ignore.
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 05:08:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <pan.2005.10.17.12.08.50.439914@cox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20051016185208.GC7641@lakedaemon.net
Jason Cooper posted <20051016185208.GC7641@lakedaemon.net>, excerpted
below, on Sun, 16 Oct 2005 14:52:08 -0400:
> Now there you go. FFI. Failure to Follow Instructions. :)
>
> Looking at buying a new MB and processor so thought I'd listen in on
> amd64 and (possibly) dual-core issues under gentoo. Yes, am reading the
> docs also. :)
AMD64s do dual-core really well. I'm not running dual-core yet, but I'm
running dual 242 Opterons, and the CPU/CPU teaming is better on AMD64, due
to the HyperTransport Interconnect, than with typical x86s. Dual-core
only increases the cooperative effect.
(FWIW, I'm running a Tyan s2885 dual socket 940, dual-core capable tho
it's now an older board, AGP and PCI-X, not PCI-Express. It's got four
slots for memory associated with each CPU/MMU, with the BIOS able to
handle 2G sticks, so a max 16 GB memory. I've been very happy with it
since I figured out my gig of PC3200 generic memory wasn't quite good to
the rated clock, and declocked it slightly (3000) in the BIOS. I expect
I'll stick with the same board, after all it's a $400 board, upgrading
memory to at least 8 gig, and possibly upgrading to dual-core CPUs giving
me a quad-core system, thru another couple years at least.)
A dual-CPU Opteron system has met all my expectations and then some. I'm
/very/ satisfied. So... regardless of whether you go single dual-core or
dual dual-core, it's a decision I don't believe you'll regret -- as long
as you aren't a gamer expecting double the performance from today's
single-threaded games. If that's your thing, top-of-the-line single-core
is better for your money. Multitasking, however... Running emerges
without interrupting or slowing your desktop... dual amd64, whether core
or cpu, does GREAT at that!
--
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman in
http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html
--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-17 12:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-16 18:52 [gentoo-amd64] [OT] test, please ignore Jason Cooper
2005-10-17 12:08 ` Duncan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=pan.2005.10.17.12.08.50.439914@cox.net \
--to=1i5t5.duncan@cox.net \
--cc=gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox