From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-amd64] Re: gcc-4.0.1 compiled glibc-2.3.5.20050722, SUCCESS! Was: broken (32bit) glibc ?
Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2005 12:12:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <pan.2005.08.06.19.12.24.592308@cox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1123346597.11655.11.camel@cloud.outersquare.org
Jeremy Huddleston posted
<1123346597.11655.11.camel@cloud.outersquare.org>, excerpted below, on
Sat, 06 Aug 2005 09:43:17 -0700:
> reiserfs is buggy when using a good compiler... I don't want to imagine
> what happens with a beta compiler ;)
Actually, reiserfs has been rock solid, here, ever since the kernel folks
added journal=ordered and made that the default. That's a pretty
significant statement, too, considering I was running defective RAM (still
am, but with a new BIOS that allows me to underclock it slightly, to
~PC3000 from PC3200, and it's stable at that) for sometime, and was
regularly locking up the entire system, without any possibility of
graceful shutdown or recovery of writes in-progress. I did lose a few
files back in the bad old days of the early 2.4 kernels (back on 32-bit
Mandrake), but IMO it's about as solid as it gets, now, even under the
fairly regular but unpredictable lockups caused by bad memory.
> Also, don't rule out glibc as the
> culprit for util-linux failing. Recompile it with gcc3.4 with a gcc4
> glibc to rule that out and make sure it's code generated by gcc4 IN
> util-linux that's the problem.
Actually, at the time I tried it I think I was on glibc-2.3.5-r1,
gcc-3.4.4 compiled. I only got the gcc-4 compiled glibc-2.3.5.20050722
snapshot successfully merged /after/ that. Remember, as I mentioned, I
forgot I had reset gcc to 3.4.4 for the util-linux remerge, and did a full
merge of the glibc snapshot with 3.4.4 instead of the 4.0.1 I had intended
to use, so it was only /after/ that, that I got the new glibc merged, to
my satisfaction.
Besides, remerging util-linux with gcc-3.4.4 fixed it right up, and it's
a short enough remerge job that I verified by trying a fresh gcc4 emerged
version again after that (hoping there might have been a patch added to
the ebuild to fix the problem since my initial emerge), and it went right
back to segfaulting, and again back to working when I remerged again with
gcc-3.4.4, so it was pretty definitely util-linux as compiled with
gcc-4.0.1, that was the issue.
BTW, I use FEATURES=buildpkg, so after initial compile, switching glibcs
back to the old gentoo approved 2.3.5-rX compiled with a gentoo approved
gcc-3.4.4, is simply a matter of emerge -K-ing the desired glibc. That's
really the only reason I'm daring enough to be running the still
hard-masked snapshot in the first place. With emerge -K, it's almost as
simple as a glibc-config, parallel to gcc-config, would be, and in some
ways less problematic, given the fact that since I've compiled KDE against
gcc-4's libstdc++, every time I gcc-config back to 3.4.x, certain KDE apps
(generally, anything using khtml, so not only Konqueror, but kweather,
and a few others) refuse to work correctly, until I gcc-config back to a
gcc-4.x once again.
--
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman in
http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html
--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-06 19:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-05 10:20 [gentoo-amd64] broken (32bit) glibc ? ViNiL
2005-08-05 11:17 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2005-08-06 13:23 ` [gentoo-amd64] gcc-4.0.1 compiled glibc-2.3.5.20050722, SUCCESS! Was: " Duncan
2005-08-06 16:43 ` Jeremy Huddleston
2005-08-06 19:12 ` Duncan [this message]
2005-08-06 21:01 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Jeremy Huddleston
2005-08-07 13:23 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2005-08-06 1:57 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Ian Hastie
2005-08-06 9:37 ` ViNiL
2005-08-10 0:01 ` Ian Hastie
2005-08-06 16:33 ` Jeremy Huddleston
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=pan.2005.08.06.19.12.24.592308@cox.net \
--to=1i5t5.duncan@cox.net \
--cc=gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox