From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dxiuv-0002Jb-DP for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 10:13:37 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j6RAAbnV024305; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 10:10:37 GMT Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6RAAauU015365 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 10:10:37 GMT Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1DxirR-0003xi-Qw for gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 12:10:01 +0200 Received: from ip68-230-97-182.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.230.97.182]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 12:10:01 +0200 Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-230-97-182.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 12:10:01 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Re: amd64 and kernel configuration Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 03:02:50 -0700 Organization: Sometimes Message-ID: References: <20050727062947.73020.qmail@mail.mng.mn> <25f58b7910e09fd5453bb3ec534330d1@xsmail.com> <20050727075012.79549.qmail@mail.mng.mn> <42E73212.2010202@olomouc.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip68-230-97-182.ph.ph.cox.net User-Agent: Pan/0.14.2.91 (As She Crawled Across the Table) Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: d767524f-7f15-4920-b84b-428cae7882d0 X-Archives-Hash: d79030044468aa945f9c60eb401adbaa Michal Zeravik posted <42E73212.2010202@olomouc.com>, excerpted below, on Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:04:50 +0200: > So does it mean I should enable SMP support for Athlon64 (winchester, > venice) ? Only if it's dual-core. I haven't kept track of which code names are, but I don't believe those are, or it'd be advertised all over and you'd definitely know it. -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman in http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list