From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (unknown [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89BA21381FA for ; Thu, 29 May 2014 07:09:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A5A3EE0879; Thu, 29 May 2014 07:09:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E052BE0843 for ; Thu, 29 May 2014 07:09:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WpuSV-0005Zt-Le for gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 29 May 2014 09:09:03 +0200 Received: from ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.231.22.224]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 29 May 2014 09:09:03 +0200 Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 29 May 2014 09:09:03 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Soliciting new RAID ideas Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 07:08:50 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <20140527223938.GA3701@sgi.com> <20140528015114.3634f6b4@marcec> <20140528152658.GA13493@sgi.com> <20140528212018.04387c61@marcec> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net User-Agent: Pan/0.140 (Chocolate Salty Balls; GIT 2ae6aff /usr/src/portage/src/egit-src/pan2) X-Archives-Salt: 269275a4-a5e4-4ac6-8f07-e0fad1818058 X-Archives-Hash: efd0982db82cfd1138e81eec8b5c10b0 Marc Joliet posted on Wed, 28 May 2014 21:20:18 +0200 as excerpted: > Am Wed, 28 May 2014 08:26:58 -0700 schrieb Bob Sanders > : > >> Marc Joliet, mused, then expounded: [snipped] > >> Thanks Mark! Interesting discussion on btrfs. >> >> [followup] Apologies - that should have been - Thanks Marc! > > You're welcome! I agree, it's an interesting discussion. And regarding > the misspelling of my name: no problem :-) . =:^) But seriously, thanks Bob for pointing out the misspelling. There's a Mark (with a k) that's quite active on the btrfs list (and has in fact done quite a bit of testing on the raid56 stuff, and written most of several related pages on the btrfs wiki), and I guess my brain has so associated him with the btrfs discussion context that without actually thinking about it, I was thinking this was the same "Mark" here. So pointing out that it's actually Marc-with-a-c here actually alerted me to the fact that it's not the same person, and very possibly saved a very confused Duncan from making quite a fool of himself in some future post either here or there as a result! So thanks VERY MUCH, Bob! =:^) (FWIW, my first name is John. But at least in my generation there's so many Johns around, and Duncan as a last name isn't uncommon either, that in fact there are quite a few John Duncans around too, and it's all horribly confusing. I even worked with a Donna at one point, and in a fairly noisy environment all you hear for either is the ON bit, so we were always either both or neither answering to calls for either one of us, since neither could easily hear which one they actually called. So I switched to the mononym "Duncan". That has been MUCH less confusing over the decades I've been using it, now. Anyway, I can definitely identify with first-name confusion. =:^) -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman