Re: [gentoo-amd64] glibc-2.12.1-r1 failure

["Paul Stear" <gentoo@appjaws.plus.com>]

On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 16:13:42 +0100, Paul Hartman  
<paul.hartman+gentoo@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 7:33 AM, Paul Stear <gentoo@appjaws.plus.com>  
> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> I think I have a symbolic link problem. Any thought on how to solve this
>> error.
> ...
>> unexpected reloc type in static binarymake[1]: ***  
>> [install-symbolic-link]
> ...
>> LDFLAGS="-Wl,--as-needed,-O1 -Wl,--enable-new-dtags -Wl,--sort-common  
>> -s"
>
> See this forum post:
>
> http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-6395405.html
>
> Seems your LDFLAGS may be the culprint. Specifically this part of
> ssuominen's post:
>
> quote:
> -Wl,-s (or plain -s) breaks Portage's strip handling,
> FEATURES="nostrip", FEATURES="-nostrip". Also, toolchain packages,
> exactly like glibc handles stripping in very selective way -> Some of
> the installed binaries/libraries *can* be stripped, and some *cannot*.
> Just forcing stripping for everything is... like I said, insane
>
Thanks for the reply
What would sensible LDFLAGS be for my amd64 system

thanks again
Paul

-- 
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/