From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1P0FFB-00037h-Nl for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 15:03:53 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D9EDBE09F3 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 15:03:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay.pcl-ipout01.plus.net (relay.pcl-ipout01.plus.net [212.159.7.99]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14AD7E0769 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 14:55:09 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AisFAJpNoExUXeb6/2dsb2JhbACDG5EYjgBxtHiSG4Eigy50BA Received: from outmx05.plus.net ([84.93.230.250]) by relay.pcl-ipout01.plus.net with ESMTP; 27 Sep 2010 15:55:04 +0100 Received: from appjaws.plus.com ([212.159.109.207] helo=pc2.homenet) by outmx05.plus.net with esmtpa (Exim) id 1P0F6d-0000Db-NE for gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 15:55:03 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: glibc-2.12.1-r1 failure References: Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 15:56:18 +0100 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Paul Stear" Organization: appjaws Message-ID: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Opera Mail/10.62 (Linux) X-Archives-Salt: 250bfc2f-71dc-441d-aaca-b03d41c418e7 X-Archives-Hash: e93853e8f8bffcd051a98a0667c9df18 On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 14:58:17 +0100, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> wrote: Duncan, >> CFLAGS="-Os -march=k8 -mno-tls-direct-seg-refs -mmmx -msse3 -pipe >> -fomit-frame-pointer" A couple of years ago I had all kinds of trouble with my amd64 system. In one of the replies to my request for help, it was suggested that I use the CFLAGS listed. I am not cleaver enough to know what they do but I haven't had many problems since using them. I'm sorry but I can not remember the experts name -- I thought it was you. I have just run the glibc update with MAKEOPTS=-j1 and have the same error to do with symlinks. I'm sure that some time ago their was an update symlinks checker, but I can't find it. Any ideas? Paul > Meanwhile, AFAIK entirely unrelated to your problem but I'm curious as I > always like to see what other people have in their CFLAGS when I have a > chance, why are you using -mno-tls-direct-seg-refs ? I don't see > anything > in the gcc manpage info on that machine/arch-flag to suggest why I might > wish to disable it, and it seems a rather odd arch-flag to simply throw > in > at random, so I'm wondering what the reasoning is. I'm definitely NOT > saying it's wrong. Quite the contrary; with a bit more info, I might > find > it useful here... or not, but I don't know at this point. So got a link > or something I could read? > -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/