From: Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@arcor.de>
To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Memory usage; 32 bit vs 64 bit.
Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2011 22:03:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ifta1n$2ig$1@dough.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D2216A9.9070009@gmail.com>
On 01/03/2011 08:34 PM, Dale wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I recently built me a new 64 bit system. My old 32 bit system has 2Gbs
> and my new system has 4Gbs. I was expecting it to use about the same
> amount of memory but noticed it uses a good bit more on the new system
> than the old one. With just the normal stuff open, I use about 1.5Gbs of
> ram. My old system would use a little over half that. I have the same
> settings on both.
>
> Is this difference because 64 bit programs use more memory, maybe they
> are larger than 32 bit programs? Just curious. I notice that Seamonkey
> uses more and KDE's plasma-desktop uses more. Those are generally the
> biggest users.
>
> I'm not complaining about the usage, just curious as to why the difference.
There's usually a very small difference (I'd say about 10%). But
nothing like you're describing (which is almost 100% if what you're
saying is true.)
How do you tell how much memory is used? If you're using KDE, System
Monitor will give you a good value that's very close to reality. On my
system (with a full blown KDE desktop with some plasmoids active and
currently Firefox + Thunderbird + Amarok running) it says "0.57 GiB of
5.8 GiB", meaning it uses about 570MB of RAM and I have 6GB total.)
After a fresh reboot it's about 230MB.
I'm sure you're not using the same configuration (I don't mean USE flags
and such, but rather how you've configured your application and desktop.)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-03 21:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-03 18:34 [gentoo-amd64] Memory usage; 32 bit vs 64 bit Dale
2011-01-03 19:08 ` Mark Knecht
2011-01-03 21:46 ` Dale
2011-01-06 18:51 ` Darragh Bailey
2011-01-06 20:52 ` Dale
2011-01-06 21:21 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2011-01-06 22:38 ` Dale
2011-01-03 19:37 ` Alex Alexander
2011-01-03 21:48 ` Dale
2011-01-04 0:15 ` Mark Knecht
2011-01-04 1:17 ` Dale
2011-01-04 1:27 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2011-01-04 7:27 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2011-01-04 9:12 ` Duncan
2011-01-04 12:59 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2011-01-06 20:31 ` Enrico Weigelt
2011-01-06 21:13 ` RES: " Eduardo Schoedler
2011-01-06 21:23 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2011-01-06 22:28 ` Enrico Weigelt
2011-01-06 20:29 ` Enrico Weigelt
2011-01-06 21:22 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2011-01-06 22:32 ` Enrico Weigelt
2011-01-06 23:42 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2011-01-07 5:59 ` Duncan
2011-01-07 11:15 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2011-01-06 22:33 ` Mark Knecht
2011-01-03 19:43 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Rich Freeman
2011-01-03 20:03 ` Nikos Chantziaras [this message]
2011-01-04 0:32 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='ifta1n$2ig$1@dough.gmane.org' \
--to=realnc@arcor.de \
--cc=gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox