From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1H2zVi-0003Uj-2a for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 06 Jan 2007 00:34:10 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id l060UXmi032750; Sat, 6 Jan 2007 00:30:33 GMT Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l060UWnq020658 for ; Sat, 6 Jan 2007 00:30:33 GMT Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1H2zS5-0001OC-M6 for gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 06 Jan 2007 01:30:25 +0100 Received: from 70.163.70-86.rev.gaoland.net ([86.70.163.70]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 06 Jan 2007 01:30:25 +0100 Received: from decamps by 70.163.70-86.rev.gaoland.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 06 Jan 2007 01:30:25 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org From: Regis Decamps Subject: [gentoo-amd64] Re: firefox 2 on amd64 Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2007 01:30:10 +0100 Message-ID: References: <459BACE3.1000107@ercbroadband.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 70.163.70-86.rev.gaoland.net User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20061108) In-Reply-To: <459BACE3.1000107@ercbroadband.org> Sender: news Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by robin.gentoo.org id l060UXnf032750 X-Archives-Salt: c8ec0986-84db-4953-8c1f-91ad40a76933 X-Archives-Hash: 671cacaa694771f91308f90cc9917fff Mark Haney wrote: > How stable is FF 2 on amd64? I know it's still masked, but if it seems= =20 > to be more or less usable (and can be compiled), i want to throw it on=20 > my laptop. if it's got serious issues, I don't have time right now to=20 > help debug so I'll wait a little longer. I just want to see what the=20 > consensus is. >=20 Hi, I might be alone, but I find firefox 2.0 less stable than 1.5. I don't=20 say it is unusable, but it is noticeably less stable than ffx 1.5 I've just upgraded to 2.0.0.1. I hope the stability to be improved. --=20 R=E9gis --=20 gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list