From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1H0HCa-0003qN-8N for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 29 Dec 2006 12:51:12 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id kBTCnO6V000252; Fri, 29 Dec 2006 12:49:24 GMT Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kBTCnOtl010494 for ; Fri, 29 Dec 2006 12:49:24 GMT Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1H0HAh-0007Kr-QT for gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 29 Dec 2006 13:49:15 +0100 Received: from ip68-231-13-122.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.231.13.122]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 29 Dec 2006 13:49:15 +0100 Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-231-13-122.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 29 Dec 2006 13:49:15 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Browsing speed problems - possibly flash related Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 12:49:06 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <5bdc1c8b0612280801j6c3b1591h3dfb4795186bf527@mail.gmail.com> <200612281559.21743.bss03@volumehost.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip68-231-13-122.ph.ph.cox.net User-Agent: pan 0.120 (Plate of Shrimp) Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: b578ad17-d879-42d7-b1a9-bc5a453ad7f8 X-Archives-Hash: 7e70d67fd8a52ef822c2b464872beb55 "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." posted 200612281559.21743.bss03@volumehost.net, excerpted below, on Thu, 28 Dec 2006 15:59:15 -0600: > On Thursday 28 December 2006 10:01, "Mark Knecht" > wrote about '[gentoo-amd64] Browsing speed problems - possibly flash > related': >> Is this a firefox-bin thing? Maybe I should build firefox from >> source? > > Good luck getting flash to work if you do that. :P Oh, it should be no problem, as long as one is building a 32-bit firefox, presumably in one's 32-bit chroot, following the Gentoo/amd64 32-bit chroot guide. Of course, if one is building a standard 64-bit firefox and expecting the 32-bit flash shared object plugin to work in the 64-bit firefox process address space, then one is in for a bit of disappointment, but that's only common sense so should be expected and go without saying. =8^P -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list