From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GQujX-0002If-Sx for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 22 Sep 2006 23:47:04 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k8MNj75E015647; Fri, 22 Sep 2006 23:45:07 GMT Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8MNj6Q2011814 for ; Fri, 22 Sep 2006 23:45:06 GMT Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1GQuha-0008U6-3L for gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 23 Sep 2006 01:45:02 +0200 Received: from ip68-230-97-209.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.230.97.209]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 23 Sep 2006 01:45:02 +0200 Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-230-97-209.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 23 Sep 2006 01:45:02 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org From: "Duncan" <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: [gentoo-amd64] Re: SOLVED: gcc 4.1 upgrade - bad desktop interactivity anyone? Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 23:42:34 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <5bdc1c8b0609221235i2270bbenf016d5fa7a1998ec@mail.gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip68-230-97-209.ph.ph.cox.net User-Agent: pan 0.113 (0.113 is one of Nakata's favorites) Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: 2fb30361-f59d-4301-bf03-24386b8994ae X-Archives-Hash: 243bf29f0ea6e0c43e96631970cf0ef8 "Mark Knecht" posted 5bdc1c8b0609221235i2270bbenf016d5fa7a1998ec@mail.gmail.com, excerpted below, on Fri, 22 Sep 2006 12:35:47 -0700: > It turns out that for me the problem was the ati-drivers package. > Switching to the radeon driver today lowered the CPU usage back to the 9% > range that I was used to: Thanks! Always nice to see freedomware win. =8^) -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list