[gentoo-amd64] Udev FUSE rules on boot

[gentoo-amd64] Udev FUSE rules on boot

[Mark Haney]

I unmasked and built the .23 kernel last week sometime and everything
has been working great.  However, I noticed over the weekend something
bombing right around udev startup with the
/etc/udev/rules.d/40-fuse.rules being invalid (or something similar).  I
can't seem to find the log that shows the error message (it wasn't in
dmesg) but is anyone else seeing this?  Is it safe to pull that rule
out?  What do I need to do to fix it?

Really, it's not a problem because everything works, and having fuse
built into the kernel is a godsend for me since I use sshfs a lot.




-- 
Recedite, plebes! Gero rem imperialem!


Mark Haney
Sr. Systems Administrator
ERC Broadband
(828) 350-2415

Call (866) ERC-7110 for after hours support
-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Udev FUSE rules on boot

[Brian Litzinger]

On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 06:04:04PM -0500, Mark Haney wrote:
> I unmasked and built the .23 kernel last week sometime and everything
> has been working great.  However, I noticed over the weekend something
> bombing right around udev startup with the
> /etc/udev/rules.d/40-fuse.rules being invalid (or something similar).  I
> can't seem to find the log that shows the error message (it wasn't in
> dmesg) but is anyone else seeing this?  Is it safe to pull that rule
> out?  What do I need to do to fix it?
> 
> Really, it's not a problem because everything works, and having fuse
> built into the kernel is a godsend for me since I use sshfs a lot.

I have had that error for months.

No idea what it means and it seems harmless.

-- 
Brian Litzinger
-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Udev FUSE rules on boot

[Canek Peláez Valdés]

On 11/5/07, Mark Haney <mhaney@ercbroadband.org> wrote:
> I unmasked and built the .23 kernel last week sometime and everything
> has been working great.  However, I noticed over the weekend something
> bombing right around udev startup with the
> /etc/udev/rules.d/40-fuse.rules being invalid (or something similar).  I
> can't seem to find the log that shows the error message (it wasn't in
> dmesg) but is anyone else seeing this?  Is it safe to pull that rule
> out?  What do I need to do to fix it?

I don't have that file; my FUSE rules are in
/etc/udev/rules.d/99-fuse.rules. Are you sure that file is not an old
one not removed in an update? What says the following command?

equery b /etc/udev/rules.d/40-fuse.rules

If it doesn't belong to any package, you can (and should) remove it.
-- 
Canek Peláez Valdés
Facultad de Ciencias, UNAM
--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list