public inbox for gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gentoo-amd64]  OpenOffice
@ 2006-07-18 21:13 Daniele Salatti
  2006-07-19  6:29 ` PaulNM
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Daniele Salatti @ 2006-07-18 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-amd64

Hi list!!
"emerge --search openoffice" show that openoffice is masked. Instead,
there is an unmasked package called openoffice-bin. Does it mean that
OOo doesn't compile on amd64?
TIA, Daniele

-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-amd64]  OpenOffice
  2006-07-18 21:13 [gentoo-amd64] OpenOffice Daniele Salatti
@ 2006-07-19  6:29 ` PaulNM
  2006-07-19  7:00   ` Daniele Salatti
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: PaulNM @ 2006-07-19  6:29 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-amd64

Daniele Salatti wrote:
> Hi list!!
> "emerge --search openoffice" show that openoffice is masked. Instead,
> there is an unmasked package called openoffice-bin. Does it mean that
> OOo doesn't compile on amd64?
> TIA, Daniele
> 

Yes, in fact, if you do an "emerge -p openoffice" it will tell you it's
masked and has a message that says something like "Don't even think of
trying to compile openoffice, it won't work anyway."


PaulNM
-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-amd64]  OpenOffice
  2006-07-19  6:29 ` PaulNM
@ 2006-07-19  7:00   ` Daniele Salatti
  2006-07-19  7:19     ` PaulNM
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Daniele Salatti @ 2006-07-19  7:00 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-amd64

PaulNM wrote:
> Daniele Salatti wrote:
>   
>> Hi list!!
>> "emerge --search openoffice" show that openoffice is masked. Instead,
>> there is an unmasked package called openoffice-bin. Does it mean that
>> OOo doesn't compile on amd64?
>> TIA, Daniele
>>
>>     
>
> Yes, in fact, if you do an "emerge -p openoffice" it will tell you it's
> masked and has a message that says something like "Don't even think of
> trying to compile openoffice, it won't work anyway."
>
>
> PaulNM
Thank you!!

-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-amd64]  OpenOffice
  2006-07-19  7:00   ` Daniele Salatti
@ 2006-07-19  7:19     ` PaulNM
  2006-07-19  8:40       ` Jan Jitse Venselaar
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: PaulNM @ 2006-07-19  7:19 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-amd64

Daniele Salatti wrote:
> PaulNM wrote:
>> Daniele Salatti wrote:
>>   
>>> Hi list!!
>>> "emerge --search openoffice" show that openoffice is masked. Instead,
>>> there is an unmasked package called openoffice-bin. Does it mean that
>>> OOo doesn't compile on amd64?
>>> TIA, Daniele
>>>
>>>     
>> Yes, in fact, if you do an "emerge -p openoffice" it will tell you it's
>> masked and has a message that says something like "Don't even think of
>> trying to compile openoffice, it won't work anyway."
>>
>>
>> PaulNM
> Thank you!!
> 

For posterity, since my AMD64X2 was not on earlier:


Optimus ~ # emerge -p openoffice

These are the packages that would be merged, in order:

Calculating dependencies
!!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "openoffice" have been masked.
!!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your
request:
- app-office/openoffice-2.0.3 (masked by: package.mask, -amd64 keyword)
# 2005/10/24 Simon Stelling <blubb@gentoo.org>
# Don't even try to compile openoffice-2.x, it won't work.


For more information, see MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man page or
refer to the Gentoo Handbook.



PaulNM
-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-amd64]  OpenOffice
  2006-07-19  7:19     ` PaulNM
@ 2006-07-19  8:40       ` Jan Jitse Venselaar
  2006-07-19 10:45         ` [gentoo-amd64] OpenOffice Daniele Salatti
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jan Jitse Venselaar @ 2006-07-19  8:40 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-amd64

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1108 bytes --]

On Wednesday 19 July 2006 09:19, PaulNM wrote:
>
> For posterity, since my AMD64X2 was not on earlier:
>
>
> Optimus ~ # emerge -p openoffice
>
> These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
>
> Calculating dependencies
> !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "openoffice" have been masked.
> !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your
> request:
> - app-office/openoffice-2.0.3 (masked by: package.mask, -amd64 keyword)
> # 2005/10/24 Simon Stelling <blubb@gentoo.org>
> # Don't even try to compile openoffice-2.x, it won't work.
>
>
> For more information, see MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man page or
> refer to the Gentoo Handbook.
>
>
>
> PaulNM
If you really want a 64-bit openoffice you can try geki's overlay ( 
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-195406.html ). Be warned though, you 
will need Java 1.6 (available from the java-migration-packages overlay), a 
lot of free disk space in /var/tmp/portage, a lot of patience and some luck. 
Also, there are still some problems, it still crashes on me now and then.

Jan Jitse

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [gentoo-amd64]  Re: OpenOffice
  2006-07-19  8:40       ` Jan Jitse Venselaar
@ 2006-07-19 10:45         ` Daniele Salatti
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Daniele Salatti @ 2006-07-19 10:45 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-amd64

Jan Jitse Venselaar wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 July 2006 09:19, PaulNM wrote:
>> For posterity, since my AMD64X2 was not on earlier:
>>
>>
>> Optimus ~ # emerge -p openoffice
>>
>> These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
>>
>> Calculating dependencies
>> !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "openoffice" have been masked.
>> !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your
>> request:
>> - app-office/openoffice-2.0.3 (masked by: package.mask, -amd64 keyword)
>> # 2005/10/24 Simon Stelling <blubb@gentoo.org>
>> # Don't even try to compile openoffice-2.x, it won't work.
>>
>>
>> For more information, see MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man page or
>> refer to the Gentoo Handbook.
>>
>>
>>
>> PaulNM
> If you really want a 64-bit openoffice you can try geki's overlay ( 
> http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-195406.html ). Be warned though, you 
> will need Java 1.6 (available from the java-migration-packages overlay), a 
> lot of free disk space in /var/tmp/portage, a lot of patience and some luck. 
> Also, there are still some problems, it still crashes on me now and then.
> 
> Jan Jitse

Uhmm...I think I will use the 32bit binary version... ;-)
Thankyou any way!!

-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2006-07-19 10:49 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-07-18 21:13 [gentoo-amd64] OpenOffice Daniele Salatti
2006-07-19  6:29 ` PaulNM
2006-07-19  7:00   ` Daniele Salatti
2006-07-19  7:19     ` PaulNM
2006-07-19  8:40       ` Jan Jitse Venselaar
2006-07-19 10:45         ` [gentoo-amd64] OpenOffice Daniele Salatti

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox