Yep, nitro is "only" ck + bootsplash + some other stuff.  And
guess what?  That's why I use  it, and not ck!  I have
never had any problems with it, and I find it to be a better patchset
than gentoo-sources.  I only wish it was updated more often, but
the maintainer is pretty busy right now.<br>
<br>
And I don't care a whole lot that nitro is unsupported.&nbsp; The dev I
asked on the issue simply said they don't want to have to provide
support for tons of kernel patchsets, which I agree they shouldn't have
to do.&nbsp; I have also found that a lot of naysayers haven't even
used nitro, or only used a much older version, which makes me skeptical.<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 10/5/05, <b class="gmail_sendername">Hemmann, Volker Armin</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de">
volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de</a>&gt; wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Hi,<br><br>ok, coaranm aside - have you EVER seen a dev recommending love- or
<br>nitro-sources?<br><br>I have not! Never! Never ever!<br><br>There seems to be a reason that a) no dev has recommended them so far and b)<br>they are not in portage.<br><br>And puulease.. nitro is nothing more than<br>
ck+bootsplash+someotherunneededstuff.<br><br>If you want the 'latency enhancement' of nitro, go directly to ck - Con<br>Kolivas knows what he does.<br>--<br><a href="mailto:gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org">gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org
</a> mailing list<br><br></blockquote></div><br>