Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Best Desktop Patchset for kernel

[Jared Lindsay <cinder.sub@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1224 bytes --]

Yep, nitro is "only" ck + bootsplash + some other stuff. And guess what?
That's why I use it, and not ck! I have never had any problems with it, and
I find it to be a better patchset than gentoo-sources. I only wish it was
updated more often, but the maintainer is pretty busy right now.

And I don't care a whole lot that nitro is unsupported. The dev I asked on
the issue simply said they don't want to have to provide support for tons of
kernel patchsets, which I agree they shouldn't have to do. I have also found
that a lot of naysayers haven't even used nitro, or only used a much older
version, which makes me skeptical.

On 10/5/05, Hemmann, Volker Armin <volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de>
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> ok, coaranm aside - have you EVER seen a dev recommending love- or
> nitro-sources?
>
> I have not! Never! Never ever!
>
> There seems to be a reason that a) no dev has recommended them so far and
> b)
> they are not in portage.
>
> And puulease.. nitro is nothing more than
> ck+bootsplash+someotherunneededstuff.
>
> If you want the 'latency enhancement' of nitro, go directly to ck - Con
> Kolivas knows what he does.
> --
> gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1624 bytes --]