From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Dwb9a-0005XB-0S
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 07:44:06 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j6O7fwVm018391;
	Sun, 24 Jul 2005 07:41:58 GMT
Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.196])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6O7fvCh015517
	for <gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 07:41:58 GMT
Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id x7so428588nzc
        for <gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 00:42:44 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=T7sUH3rTK9YgPffWka5mVruOD1PcxBo5EQT0AYVe4UjCZ5DvBpiAXJQko/Wn6vZ6VluB92ZA+RCWAV/i06xnJ1oep8SrBZLgYOYFf4A8vZ5UG8sDoD3Pd8drhgZfsKFhLVbKCFyOCZqm32r6fjzUxmIK4z10HN6lKKHlDGuY8go=
Received: by 10.36.3.9 with SMTP id 9mr1100197nzc;
        Sun, 24 Jul 2005 00:42:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.36.75.4 with HTTP; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 00:42:44 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <e16d914c0507240042780f83e6@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 00:42:44 -0700
From: Jared Lindsay <cinder.sub@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] x86_64 optimization patches for glibc.
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0507240733540.27896@aclx24.physik.rwth-aachen.de>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-amd64+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-amd64+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-amd64+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-amd64.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <42E258A7.5080501@telia.com> <42E2C177.6090001@erols.com>
	 <42E2C675.1010905@erols.com>
	 <11fc6a2505072318479fd6473@mail.gmail.com>
	 <42E30CCE.8060102@erols.com>
	 <Pine.LNX.4.61.0507240733540.27896@aclx24.physik.rwth-aachen.de>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by robin.gentoo.org id j6O7fvCh015517
X-Archives-Salt: cb1634d8-635d-4c3c-8953-a72d48072769
X-Archives-Hash: 500b079591958ee77a145aebcbf95a5d

Back on to a different subject...has anyone looked at the libm
section?  I am curious as to how much of a performance increase that
would add if we can get it working.

On 7/23/05, Ian McCulloch <ianmcc@physik.rwth-aachen.de> wrote:
> 
> 
> On Sat, 23 Jul 2005, Matt Randolph wrote:
> 
> > Sean Johnson wrote:
> >
> > > LOL!
> > > That must be for the folk that don't mind patching glibc, but will get
> > > upset if memcpy does strange things. :)
> > >
> > >
> >
> > You try to do a good turn and they laugh at you.  That'll teach me.
> 
> Heh ;-)  I would like to see a version of memcpy.c that DOES do something
> malicious, without being completely obvious.  This isn't Windows, a
> seg-fault isn't going to take down the kernel, or corrupt the filesystem;)
> 
> Cheers
> Ian
> --
> gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
> 
>

-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list