From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K94gb-0000Cf-37 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 18 Jun 2008 20:55:21 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0FEA6E0432; Wed, 18 Jun 2008 20:55:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ik-out-1112.google.com (ik-out-1112.google.com [66.249.90.179]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE661E0432 for ; Wed, 18 Jun 2008 20:55:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ik-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id c21so271514ika.2 for ; Wed, 18 Jun 2008 13:55:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=dIPCmEpBarAiKqHNPM06nyUDEgZRZkOb0b+d3QeVpFE=; b=FAtca98MT2qjxnXFIZ3pgGzlRs8z9+UYHPTh5bH/V2+5djCY5RS1dQSjCJgXGA/vor pB/7ApV6tKplHBkdQbdwioOb+ow30s5WYzTnod6M2nqE9wGsxqB7mIS+nG8TYOL1ePEF i5Z3dpjx7t2avvytR604r6QDJFQkVbeeWwSAw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=FohSi+y8RiAgACQEFMFsYje0KZiztmQoEoEZtS/HG5OTg3U0pxUG2oUsdOlwtbSofq 3Re6Butjp7O/kJ6XBB2GZIrn1qLBjNY6jZvvmkrFE1DLjCH7fifCQ4E1v+nLOH09FZdz 5qpOgolWAWuhAclKrYuBeFSDHl6WzgOeFzAPw= Received: by 10.210.46.12 with SMTP id t12mr1067717ebt.23.1213822519026; Wed, 18 Jun 2008 13:55:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.210.19.6 with HTTP; Wed, 18 Jun 2008 13:55:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 20:55:18 +0000 From: Beso To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Obligatory FF3 question. In-Reply-To: <48592D27.2080506@ercbroadband.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_1826_27664544.1213822519024" References: <4858FC28.3050006@ercbroadband.org> <485908FF.9090600@cesmail.net> <48591683.7060705@ercbroadband.org> <48592D27.2080506@ercbroadband.org> X-Archives-Salt: d8d5f8a7-da73-4875-8986-89d2ff044232 X-Archives-Hash: b51c797d9eb7f636aa486d52f972cb72 ------=_Part_1826_27664544.1213822519024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline 2008/6/18 Mark Haney : > Beso wrote: > >> 2008/6/18 Mark Haney : >> >> M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote: >>> >>> Mark Haney wrote: >>>> >>>> So, how's it working? Anyone emerged it yet? >>>>> >>>>> The binary is working ... the mirrors are hosed on the source version, >>>>> >>>> though. They have the binary version and the checksums don't match. >>>> >>>> I was able to get good source. It built and it absolutely hauls the >>> proverbial ass. >>> >>> >> have you tried it with the new gnash plugin and the new icedtea (the free >> openjdk java plugin that seems to be compatible at 90% with java6 ) on >> amd64 >> arch? >> >> >> >> > No I haven't. How is it? > > well, icedtea, from the latest news in my possession has merged with openjdk ad java plugin and it supports nearly 90% of java around (this means that there's no need for a 32bit wrapper for java with firefox). gnash is now fully compatible with flash v7 and has about 50% of flash 8 and 9 serie. now with the opening of the flash format specifications gnash should progress much faster than it was before. for example i've read that with firefox 2 with gnash and java youtube (usually a quite bad site for flash players and which has also some java code included, for my knowledge) is playing well (more than 85% of videos work well and the remnants just need to use the gnash controls to work). but as i've said, i haven't tried it yet so i don't know if these assertions are reallly true. -- dott. ing. beso ------=_Part_1826_27664544.1213822519024 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline 2008/6/18 Mark Haney <mhaney@ercbroadband.org>:
Beso wrote:
2008/6/18 Mark Haney <mhaney@ercbroadband.org>:

M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:

Mark Haney wrote:

So, how's it working?  Anyone emerged it yet?

 The binary is working ... the mirrors are hosed on the source version,
though. They have the binary version and the checksums don't match.

I was able to get good source.  It built and it absolutely hauls the
proverbial ass.


have you tried it with the new gnash plugin and the new icedtea (the free
openjdk java plugin that seems to be compatible at 90% with java6 ) on amd64
arch?




No I haven't.  How is it?


well, icedtea, from the latest news in my possession has merged with openjdk ad java plugin and it supports nearly 90% of java around (this means that there's no need for a 32bit wrapper for java with firefox).
gnash is now fully compatible with flash v7 and has about 50% of flash 8 and 9 serie. now with the opening of the flash format specifications gnash should progress much faster than it was before. for example i've read that with firefox 2 with gnash and java youtube (usually a quite bad site for flash players and which has also some java code included, for my knowledge) is playing well (more than 85% of videos work well and the remnants just need to use the gnash controls to work).
but as i've said, i haven't tried it yet so i don't know if these assertions are reallly true.


--
dott. ing. beso ------=_Part_1826_27664544.1213822519024-- -- gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org mailing list