From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K8zlc-0006FE-4D for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 18 Jun 2008 15:40:12 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 68064E0351; Wed, 18 Jun 2008 15:40:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.169]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 217F6E0351 for ; Wed, 18 Jun 2008 15:40:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id z27so817906ugc.49 for ; Wed, 18 Jun 2008 08:40:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=tpASKRyLVMkAvg0+6Urpvt0qyTp/AoTS+eMcA+Hk6yM=; b=PoKKmRx49VwndyR7HqM3jIelimpvlXHt16GlU94CpuJSBnaxaMsrib1DFxSdubIQF+ vyYHu9mwzsgKYSCqDvWtzCEi5ZMS9AyGq0bBnVIRFzKvRVulluY6bXa+rnW8VPMIZo9/ 5m9auw9q6+RxCLqMWIMi8tUrY5JuxVCyAOtsA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=Vzg5i8GS0B2TDIdP4yaIfbHkuM6ExDq1CiQ3vZdnDJ1HGJDaMl8NcNLGavH0M8QMN6 EdtcrKaIlR5JWkrllxV+jt9GAIGTw2hz0NJ8UfJD+4FKRCjKwlQcfBNiJ4MWVqCkB8RB QnKHh4r4J2kQukx9Xe81uHYTlac7p5z3EetmE= Received: by 10.210.22.16 with SMTP id 16mr727965ebv.86.1213803609387; Wed, 18 Jun 2008 08:40:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.210.19.6 with HTTP; Wed, 18 Jun 2008 08:40:09 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 15:40:09 +0000 From: Beso To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Obligatory FF3 question. In-Reply-To: <48591683.7060705@ercbroadband.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_777_7083880.1213803609380" References: <4858FC28.3050006@ercbroadband.org> <485908FF.9090600@cesmail.net> <48591683.7060705@ercbroadband.org> X-Archives-Salt: 5863916e-7daf-4413-9a8b-57e78170940e X-Archives-Hash: 30293646cc85adbcd15e7d65145188d2 ------=_Part_777_7083880.1213803609380 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline 2008/6/18 Mark Haney : > M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote: > >> Mark Haney wrote: >> >>> So, how's it working? Anyone emerged it yet? >>> >>> The binary is working ... the mirrors are hosed on the source version, >> though. They have the binary version and the checksums don't match. >> > > I was able to get good source. It built and it absolutely hauls the > proverbial ass. > have you tried it with the new gnash plugin and the new icedtea (the free openjdk java plugin that seems to be compatible at 90% with java6 ) on amd64 arch? -- dott. ing. beso ------=_Part_777_7083880.1213803609380 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline

2008/6/18 Mark Haney <mhaney@ercbroadband.org>:
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
Mark Haney wrote:
So, how's it working?  Anyone emerged it yet?

The binary is working ... the mirrors are hosed on the source version, though. They have the binary version and the checksums don't match.

I was able to get good source.  It built and it absolutely hauls the proverbial ass.

have you tried it with the new gnash plugin and the new icedtea (the free openjdk java plugin that seems to be compatible at 90% with java6 ) on amd64 arch?



--
dott. ing. beso ------=_Part_777_7083880.1213803609380-- -- gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org mailing list